• I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I feel like the designation should require more than a promise not to use city funds to help other states prosecute people who moved there for trans reasons. I don’t think any cities in California would be doing that anyway.

    It’s a start, but we can do more.

      • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Expanding support programs.

        Sacramento does do a lot, the Sacramento LGBT Community Center is partially city (tax payer) funded and provides a lot in the way of safe housing and essential support- if you’re under 24.

        I feel like if it’s going to get the designation of Sanctuary City it should be providing targeted help to people escaping/relocating from states where their, or their children’s existence has been made illegal.

        It seems like an empty accolade, since I really don’t think we would be extraditing trans folk back to hostile states anyway, but it’s nice that we’ve promised not to.

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Good points. This could be something community groups could push for. I’m not too plugged into advocacy on the city council but maybe I should be.

  • Lath@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I looked up the definition of “Sacrament” and as such, I would like to say this:

    It’s a trap!

    Thank you