I found an av1-labeled version of a TV show on Sonarr, so I downloaded it, replacing my previous 264 version. I started to play it and realized it was a smaller 264 version.

Is there a way for Sonarr and Radarr to verify if a download’s version matches it’s label? Do I just need to stick with trusted distribution groups?

  • MostlyGibberish@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This doesn’t directly answer your question, but highly recommend checking out https://trash-guides.info/

    They have a ton of guides on how to configure and automate really detailed rules for sonarr/radarr. So, while it won’t help you verify the download matches the labels, it’ll make it more likely to get releases from reputable sources that are more likely to use accurate labels.

  • ChojinDSL@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    You can try to faff around with keywords and tags, e.g. give x264 or x265 a higher score rating, etc… As a failsafe you can configure a trashcan location and specify that all deleted files go there first and don’t get emptied for X amount of days.

    • machinin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Would the keywords help with mislabeled files?

      Thanks for the ideas on the failsafe. I’ll check into it.

      • ChojinDSL@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Mislabeled files, not so much. Since there isn’t really a way to verify the content until it’s downloaded. You can adjust things like which file sizes are considered a certain quality, e.g. HD or 4k. But one approach could be that you define tags for release groups which you know and trust. And give those tags a higher score. This should lead to releases by those groups being preferred.

        You can of course add multiple tags with positive and negative scores. For example I use tags to give a higher score to releases that have 5.1 audio, or which are non-hdr.

        • Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          Qbittorrent has a feature to execute a command on torrent complete iirc. You might be able to write a few ffmpeg commands to verify and delete/move/whatever based on that result. Not very user-friendly though ofc and requires some bash knowledge.

      • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        No, it doesn’t help.

        The only help for this is to be on a reputable tracker which cares about quality. That’s usually private trackers

          • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago
            1. Install arr
            2. Look into prowlarr and search for the trackers that are listed there. Filter for what you are looking for.
            3. Look for trackers that have open applications.
            4. Apply with a text about your torrent behavior, what you are looking for and what you bring to the table.
            5. Become invited to your first tracker.
            6. Over time, apply to other trackers with the same method.
            7. Alternatively ask nicely for invites on your private tracker but don’t over due this and only if your repuration is high enough.
  • WASTECH@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I would really recommend looking into Usenet. I was in your position a few months ago (starting to look for private trackers), but ended up hearing about Usenet and going that route instead. It has been amazing so far. It has everything I am looking for, I don’t need to worry about a VPN, and I can download as fast as my ISP can go, so I get my content in minutes instead of hours. I also don’t have to worry about my VPN disconnecting for some reason and my ISP sending me a nasty letter. The only downside is, if you want the best, you’ll have to pay for an indexer and a downloader, but it’s not that expensive and is certainly worth it for the benefits over torrents.

    • gdog05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Same. I took some of the money I was paying for streaming services and paid for usenet and vip service opensubtitles. Black Friday hit and I got more usenet services which is great to have.

      I like having the content but I was fine paying for legitimate services until they started trying to fuck me over.

    • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Do you have any reading material suggestions with usenet?

      Private trackers sound like hard work. Sounds like you pay a fee to have access to the tracker and you need to have a good upload ratio to not be kicked out.

      • WASTECH@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        As much as I hate to send anyone to Reddit, the wiki on the Usenet subreddit is great. They explain the concepts and components and have a list of good indexers and providers.

        If you have any other questions or need help setting anything up, feel free to send me a PM.

    • Codilingus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve been rocking recyclarr now for almost a year. Was a pain in the ass to figure out the config, but very nice automate another piece off the Arr machine.