• jumperalex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      why did you waste your time asking that question when you already knew the answer?

      It’s always the profits!!!

      • Brahm1nmam@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I get it costs money to develop accessibility, but you can’t rip off a blind man if he can’t navigate your sight. I truly don’t get it.

        Edit: site, not sight

        • Eranziel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’ve simply run the numbers and decided it would cost more to support the blind man’s access than they could get from plundering the blind man.

    • whats_a_refoogee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would they let a tiny % of users get in their way of building a monopoly?