Nationally, an estimated 26 percent of public school students were considered chronically absent last school year, up from 15 percent before the pandemic, according to the most recent data, from 40 states and Washington, D.C., compiled by the conservative-leaning American Enterprise Institute. Chronic absence is typically defined as missing at least 10 percent of the school year, or about 18 days, for any reason.

  • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    It feels like we’re sick all the time now. We hold our kids out more frequently than we used to as well, to avoid getting other people sick.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      We also keep them home if we think they might be sick. When I was a child, you had to have a fever, sore throat, or vomiting to stay home. There are more conditions that warrant staying home now.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, my understanding is that people are spending about twice as much time sick as pre-pandemic. Probably responsible for a third to half of the increase in chronic absenteeism.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Local Schools where I am just change their attendance policies and I think that’s the cause of a lot of it around here. I was talking to the attendance office the other day and they said that an absence for any period in school counts as an absence for the whole day. So when I had to pick up the boy from the nurse’s office at 3:00 they counted him absent for the whole day. That’s not how it wasn’t my day, when I went to school they took attendance at 10:00 and didn’t give a shit past that

  • nehal3m
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    School is not all that important. At least not so important that missing a few extra days will make an appreciable difference. What’s important is love and a good relationship with your loved ones. Looking back at my childhood spending quality time together would have done way more good for my development than sitting in class learning I don’t even remember what.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They’re not talking about a few days; they’re talking about missing 18 or more school days per year. That’s almost a month worth of class.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Or one day every two weeks. Which doesn’t seem that bad, when you consider normal cadence of dentist visits, checkups, vacations, and the occasional 3 day flu.

      • nehal3m
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yes, I read the article. I stand by my point.

        School as it is right now is a remnant of the effort to educate children into competent factory workers or management. We’ve grown to accept that the 40 hour week starting when you’re 4 or 5 years old is a prerequisite to a successful career (and by extension, life) and that the point of the whole system is to give kids a fighting chance in the economy as it will exist 20 years after they start that journey. We implicitly assume that is the best way to go about life and we’ve structured society around it.

        I question whether it’s still worth it for today’s kids. Kids who are destined to excel academically probably will. Forcing the rest to go through the motions at the cost of their childhood is not the best way to treat humans in my opinion.

        • Rolder@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          Personal opinion is that some level of education is required to fully function in modern society. The basics like math, language, history, etc. Plus school offers a good way for kids to socialize with others their age which is important.

          Now on the other hand, the current format of waking kids up at 8AM, loading them with homework, forcing them to take standardized tests… that all is a bit much.

        • Clent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Childhood is a recent invention. If it wasn’t for societies expectations for school and child labor laws, it would not exist.

          Get rid of school requirements and the child labor laws will quickly follow. Then childhood goes poof.

          • nehal3m
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s a non sequitur. How would child labor laws disappearing follow from adjusting school such that it serves the humans it purports to?

            Keep in mind I never said ban school. A sibling comment to yours rightly made the point that there are some educational basics required to function in society and I agree. Having children and young adults spend some amount of time with that is a good thing. It’s just too much of a daycare, a fulltime job simulator and a standardised test score generator as it stands.

            • Clent@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Child labor laws are already being rolled back by republicans. You failed to acknowledge the recent creation of childhood. Claiming these are non sequiturs indicates a lack of knowledge of history and current political movements; a sophomoric perspective that you’re projected on to me.

              Based on your response, I expect you to continue to dismiss what I say rather than taking the time to look at your internal logic and attempt to compensate for your blind spots.

              • nehal3m
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Talk about sophomoric.

                edit: oh and US centric.

                • Clent@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Yes. My bad for a US centric take on an US newspaper’s reporting on US students.