- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Nationally, an estimated 26 percent of public school students were considered chronically absent last school year, up from 15 percent before the pandemic, according to the most recent data, from 40 states and Washington, D.C., compiled by the conservative-leaning American Enterprise Institute. Chronic absence is typically defined as missing at least 10 percent of the school year, or about 18 days, for any reason.
School is not all that important. At least not so important that missing a few extra days will make an appreciable difference. What’s important is love and a good relationship with your loved ones. Looking back at my childhood spending quality time together would have done way more good for my development than sitting in class learning I don’t even remember what.
They’re not talking about a few days; they’re talking about missing 18 or more school days per year. That’s almost a month worth of class.
Or one day every two weeks. Which doesn’t seem that bad, when you consider normal cadence of dentist visits, checkups, vacations, and the occasional 3 day flu.
Yes, I read the article. I stand by my point.
School as it is right now is a remnant of the effort to educate children into competent factory workers or management. We’ve grown to accept that the 40 hour week starting when you’re 4 or 5 years old is a prerequisite to a successful career (and by extension, life) and that the point of the whole system is to give kids a fighting chance in the economy as it will exist 20 years after they start that journey. We implicitly assume that is the best way to go about life and we’ve structured society around it.
I question whether it’s still worth it for today’s kids. Kids who are destined to excel academically probably will. Forcing the rest to go through the motions at the cost of their childhood is not the best way to treat humans in my opinion.
Personal opinion is that some level of education is required to fully function in modern society. The basics like math, language, history, etc. Plus school offers a good way for kids to socialize with others their age which is important.
Now on the other hand, the current format of waking kids up at 8AM, loading them with homework, forcing them to take standardized tests… that all is a bit much.
Childhood is a recent invention. If it wasn’t for societies expectations for school and child labor laws, it would not exist.
Get rid of school requirements and the child labor laws will quickly follow. Then childhood goes poof.
That’s a non sequitur. How would child labor laws disappearing follow from adjusting school such that it serves the humans it purports to?
Keep in mind I never said ban school. A sibling comment to yours rightly made the point that there are some educational basics required to function in society and I agree. Having children and young adults spend some amount of time with that is a good thing. It’s just too much of a daycare, a fulltime job simulator and a standardised test score generator as it stands.
Child labor laws are already being rolled back by republicans. You failed to acknowledge the recent creation of childhood. Claiming these are non sequiturs indicates a lack of knowledge of history and current political movements; a sophomoric perspective that you’re projected on to me.
Based on your response, I expect you to continue to dismiss what I say rather than taking the time to look at your internal logic and attempt to compensate for your blind spots.
Talk about sophomoric.
edit: oh and US centric.
Yes. My bad for a US centric take on an US newspaper’s reporting on US students.
You’re responding to my comment though which was always about school in general.
You accuse me of failing to engage but the way I see it I distilled your point and framed the counter argument as a question. Instead of answering it you accuse me of being sophomoric and ironically accuse me of failing to engage.