In other words, 35 Michiganders have had their constitutional rights violated without due process.

  • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    From my cold, dead hands.

    That’s exactly what the law is intended to prevent:

    if a person is found to be at risk of harm to themselves or others with a gun, the state’s new so-called ‘red flag’ law can temporarily take away their firearms.

    • BottomTierJannie
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m not property of the government, why should the government suspend my rights to “protect” me from myself?

      • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        There’s a rule-breaking quip with which I could respond, but…I won’t.

        Instead, I’ll just say, please stop functionally supporting potential criminals with firearms.

        • Throwaway@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          “Potential criminals”, they’re also known as innocent people. What is this, minority report?

    • Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      “Temporarily” take away their rights.

      They’re from the government, and they’re here to help, right?