• lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not sure why, would have been a pretty cool addition to the universe.

    I can imagine nowadays people saying it’s “too woke” though.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      8 months ago

      Back then :

      It won’t bring in the same money, don’t put your weird tranny shit

      Now :

      This is marketable in certain demographics, but we’ve already met the diversity quota, so no thanks. Besides, we don’t want it to be too “political” and lose our dependable fanbase.

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ah yes, famously apolitical movie The Matrix in the entirely apolitical genre of dystopian sci-fi.

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Dystopian? Ah yes, no one was turning a profit. Very sad.

          Although that Cyrus character was quite the go getter.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I can think of one reasonable reason for it. They’d be harder to identify between the two versions. It makes some sense to not change the look that much (or the actor if that was the plan) to not confuse the audience.

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Also have to pay and credit two actors for one role, which might get sticky, especially with awards.

        • Wilzax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          I mean you credit them as 2 different roles, Switch (In-Matrix) and Switch (IRL). Happens all the time for different ages of the same characters being portrayed by younger and older actors.