Techie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前Unpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comexternal-linkmessage-square101fedilinkarrow-up1784arrow-down115cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1769arrow-down1external-linkUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comTechie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square101fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前I believe there would be the same amount, or possibly more ads, but more targeted and more intrusive.
minus-squareshalva97@lemmy.sdfeu.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前But that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0
I believe there would be the same amount, or possibly more ads, but more targeted and more intrusive.
But that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0