“Portland’s St. John’s Bridge and the Lewis & Clark Bridge connecting Oregon and Washington are among the seven bridges on the list.”

  • kwomp2
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Isn’t this just fearmongering?

    Beeing afraid of bridges that don’t stand the impact of a containership crash? Crashproofing bridges? What cost to cover what probability?

    • zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      No. Bridges built in modern times have protection against such incidents and as the Baltimore event demonstrated, for very good reason. They make barriers around the piers to absorb and impact and wow - who would have known - avoid the bridge collapsing.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I wouldn’t say fear mongering and much as ignorance.

      Most things bridges, dams, etc would fail if hit by a modern container ship. These ships are massive. It’s basic physics.

      9/11 people were shocked since they thought the towers were designed to survive a plane hit. What they didn’t get is that modern planes are much larger, which more fuel and more speed.

      • kwomp2
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Many people don’t think about large objects in terms of mass, momentum, statics very often. Even though are right calling it basic physics. The lack of practice in this kind of “physics thinking” results in a lack of knowledge and intuition about, lets say, ship VS. bridge. I wouldn’t call that ignorance, because having “basic knowledge, practice and intuition” about each of the main scientific disciplines requires quite a lot of time and besides that, being quite a gigantic nerd. At least thats what I feel like.

        People knowing about their fields of responsibility and interest is fine, I guess. They still deserve being informed about everything else in a helpful way. Like, compensate their lack of nerdyness with proper fluffin’ journalism! That’s what this trade is meant to do.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s what ignorance is. It’s not knowing something. That is the literal definition of the word. I’m ignorant on repairing airplane engines. Nothing wrong with being ignorant on something but don’t try to write an article about it.

          • kwomp2
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Oh I see. I thought ignorance means like wrongful not-knowing.

  • AgedCheddar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’d imagine a lot of bridges are vulnerable to being smashed the fuck into by a boat