• PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Tankie doesn’t mean socialist” meaning “Tankie and socialist are not synonyms”. All tankies are (arguably) socialists, but not all socialists are tankies. Most socialists, since the fall of the USSR and the flow of funds from it, are not tankies.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        By not answering if you are a socialist or if you’re pro-NATO, I can only assume you are a liberal or centrist. If that is the case, I can understand why you hate tankies. You are closer to MAGA then they are. Of course they’re your enemy.

        • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          lmao. Not a tankie, just using the same rhetoric as they do. Why don’t you call me a ‘social fascist’ next for believing in a democratic government?

            • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              To me, personally? MAGA is more of a threat. To many elsewhere in the world, tankies are the greater threat. Unless you’d like to go talk to some folk in concentration camps in Xinjiang and tell them that their real threat is American right-wingers.

              Nazis are worse than tankies, but not for lack of trying by tankies.

              • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                From a utilitarianist perspective, American right-wingers are a bigger threat. If they take over, they have an $860 billion military to unleash on the world. The way I’m interpreting this; you’re a closet conservative who thinks he’s a liberal. Yo hate communism more than fascism. Am I correct?

                • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If they take over, they have an $860 billion military to unleash on the world.

                  “To unleash on the world”

                  Tell me you have a surface level understanding of world politics without saying you have a surface level understanding of world politics.

                  Yo hate communism more than fascism. Am I correct?

                  I already literally said the opposite

                  Nazis are worse than tankies, but not for lack of trying by tankies.

                  Are you even pretending to argue in good faith at this point? If you are, it’s not very convincing.

                  • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I try to always argue in good faith. But I tire of arguing with liberals/ conservatives with recursive arguments. There is no logic. If there is, you fail to make me understand it. Is this WhatIfAltHist?