Who would have thought this would have happened?

  • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    Wages are set by supply and demand. I blame the correct person in this situation. The California government

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        No, the workers blame the government as well. The government is the one who took their jobs away.

        • BunkerBuster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          If a company can’t afford to pay their employees a livable wage, they deserve to go under. Yeah it sucks for the workers but so does staying with a company that can’t pay them. Stop licking boots.

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            8 months ago

            You’re licking boots.

            The people were living on their current wage. They were happy with their wage. It’s in the article.

            Now they have no job and no wages. Now they are sad.

            Their wage was liveable to them. Now it’s not. The market was working fine until the government got in the middle and took away their jobs.

            • BunkerBuster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              “He did blame it on the minimum wage increase. Although, from my understanding, I think we were exempt from it because of the amount of locations that he personally owns. But, he did ultimately blame it on that increase,” she said.

              How about this for a new title: “Salty Restaurant owner doesn’t like new law that doesn’t apply to him, fires everyone anyway”

              Gotta love the free market, right?

              You’re licking corporate boot to defend shitty business practices.

              • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                8 months ago

                The law does apply to him. She’s incorrect.

                A better title would be California governor causes mass layoffs.

                The owner has no obligation to provide jobs. If the risk isn’t worth the reward, he’ll shut down. That’s how it works.