roon@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 9 months agoHilariouslemmy.mlimagemessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1944arrow-down133file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1911arrow-down1imageHilariouslemmy.mlroon@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square33fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareEunieIsTheBus@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up65·9 months agoPoint four was the first thing I immediately noticed.
minus-squareSolivine@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up25arrow-down1·9 months agoTechnically 102 if you include the one already said
minus-squareEunieIsTheBus@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up22·9 months agoNo, they explicitely demanded the 100 times after the say-i-am-sorry-once-routine terminated
minus-squareSolivine@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·9 months agoIt wasn’t explicit! What if the amount of sorries is stored in a global state? She didn’t necessarily specify 100 more sorries. Women so confusing smh.
minus-squareibasaw@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 months agoforever scarred by OBO errors… I noticed that too
Point four was the first thing I immediately noticed.
Technically 102 if you include the one already said
No, they explicitely demanded the 100 times after the say-i-am-sorry-once-routine terminated
It wasn’t explicit! What if the amount of sorries is stored in a global state? She didn’t necessarily specify 100 more sorries. Women so confusing smh.
forever scarred by OBO errors… I noticed that too