• bjorney@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    7 months ago

    She has north of 3m in sponsorship deals right now, and we can only assume that number will go up in the WNBA

    • silverbax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It may go down in the WNBA. Caitlin Clark isn’t the first player who was expected to make the WNBA popular (Maya Moore, Brittany Griner, etc). It’s far too early to tell if she will have any impact on WNBA viewership.

      The issue is that NIL money is also a way for boosters to pay players to stay instead of the shadowy back door deals that used to happen. Now NIL just allows boosters to pay players through a legitimate channel.

      • booly
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        A lot of NIL money during the off-season is booster money, yes. That’s money that basically will only go to athletes signed with a particular school.

        But there’s also a lot of NIL money for actual big budget TV/print advertising from national corporations for ads produced by major ad agencies. That’s money that follows the athlete.

        Not all of it will follow the athlete to the pros (and not every athlete goes pro), especially since the WNBA seems to have lower viewership than NCAA women’s basketball. But if anyone is gonna be making good money on sponsorships in the WNBA, it’ll be Caitlin Clark.