In his sentencing memo Thursday, U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney made it clear why he was letting Tyler Laube off lightly.

It wasn’t just because of what Laube did or didn’t do – the defendant had already confessed to beating a journalist at a 2017 Southern California rally and pleaded guilty to violating riot laws as part of a white supremacist gang.

Laube deserved a light sentence, Carney said, because prosecutors should have focused on leftist groups.

In a 22-page memo, Carney repeatedly said prosecutors have “ignored” violence committed by Antifa and instead focused on targeting people like Laube – Trump supporters and members of the far right.

The federal judge’s strong words – and clear political bent – are as unusual as they are uninformed, legal experts told USA TODAY.

He’s really gone off the deep end,” said John Donohue, a professor at Stanford Law School.

  • Veraxus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    I get what you’re saying, but there needs to strong and effective remedies for situations like this.

    This judge needs to be removed and barred from any public office or service, and every ruling they ever made carefully re-evaluated.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I agree. These rulings seem politically motivated and, as the experts in the article said, reflect shocking ignorance of the situation. Unfortunately, unlike most state judiciaries, there is no body set up to scrutinise federal judges. The only recourse is political, through impeachment.