Big Tech companies want to chain your passkey to their products. Enter Proton Pass, which allows you to manage and use passkeys across all devices seamlessly.
  • Big Tech has implemented passkeys in a way that locks users into their platforms rather than providing universal security
  • Passkeys were developed to replace passwords for better account security, but their rollout by Apple and Google has limited their potential
  • Proton Pass offers passkeys that are universal, easy to use, and available to everyone for improved online security and privacy.
  • capital@lemmy.worldEnglish
    741·
    9 months ago

    If I can’t add your passkey to my Bitwarden vault, I’m not using your passkey.

    • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.worldEnglish
      16·
      9 months ago

      Yeah or if they only offer 2FA via SMS. Like 1) it’s not even that much more secure and 2) it’s just more awkward.

      But I also hate how Steam and Blizzard only allow you to verify logins in their mobile app. Fucking ridiculous.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nlEnglish
        4·
        9 months ago

        It is stupid that they not only require the app to be present, but to verify each and every trade. Even those for items that drop to everyone for free. Good thing it does work in an Android VM but still - very annoying.

      • hperrin@lemmy.worldEnglish
        121·
        9 months ago

        That doesn’t seem unreasonable at all for not having to host your own server.

        • Serinus@lemmy.worldEnglish
          110·
          9 months ago

          That’s with hosting your own server. Unfortunately I only discovered this paywall after sending them $10 out of good will.

          Of course it’s open source, so it’s certainly possible to break their DRM, and if it were something less sensitive I would.

          I still might, but VaultWarden looks like a better alternative.

      • sugar_in_your_teaEnglish
        9·
        9 months ago

        I pay $10/year for my wife and I, total. The $40 is if you want 3-6 people. AFAIK, you still need to pay if you self-host and use the premium features, but you can self host on the free plan as well.

        $10/year for my wife and I is completely reasonable, and I’d pay the $40/year if my kids needed their own accounts. It’s a fantastic service.

        • Serinus@lemmy.worldEnglish
          32·
          9 months ago

          If you self host you need the $40 plan for two people. Seems kinda backwards, doesn’t it?

          Yeah, they absolutely don’t make that clear or I wouldn’t have gone with Bitwarden.

            • Serinus@lemmy.worldEnglish
              12·
              9 months ago

              You’d think that based on your link, wouldn’t you. I did.

              My support ticket response:

              Hi Serinus,
              ​There actually isnt a mistake what you are reading is the pricing page for premium individuals, which you already have. But if you check our pricing page for orgs and you are in the free org, you will see that you cannot self-host the free org, as seen here.
              You can find more information here; https://bitwarden.com/help/password-manager-plans/#compare-personal-plans
              I hope you find this clear and helpful.
              Kind regards,
              A
              Follow Bitwarden on social media:

              • sugar_in_your_teaEnglish
                2·
                9 months ago

                Your issue is creating an org. The free tier allows again one collection with one user. So don’t create an org, share a collection.

                • Serinus@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  1·
                  9 months ago

                  One user can’t share a collection with another user. An org is required to share.

                  • sugar_in_your_teaEnglish
                    2·
                    9 months ago

                    I’ll have to check. I haven’t self-hosted mine yet, but I thought the collection share I do with my wife is different.

                    You could very well be right, which would be disappointing.