• Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Got to eat. Retirement is gone, and your 401k is nothing more than a subsidy so you can work part time as a greeter until death.

    • Crowfiend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Using median makes it a loaded statistic skewed in favor of the minority (in this case, the wealthy).

      Over half the country is living paycheck-to-paycheck, so that median number is already in the ‘well-off’ category by default, making them irrelevant to the main point of discussion.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        You have it backwards. The mean, not the median, is skewed by outliers.

        If there are ten people in a room with $10 and one person with $1,000,000, the median is $10 whereas the mean is ~$90,000.

      • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Is that true? Median is literally taking the value in the middle. So if there are 30 million 70 year olds then it would be picking the 15th millionth person and using their savings.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You might not know what median means (math pun!).

        Averages or Means are skewed by outliers, not the median. The median is just picking the middle number in a list of numbers. There is no skewing possible. If you have 99 people making $1 per year and one person making $1B per year, the median is $1. The average/mean is $1,000,000.99 which is way skewed.

    • PoopDelivery
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      No one is putting their entire retirement into the stock market, so they’re not doubling the amount.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        At age 40, it’s recommended that you put 60-80% of retirement funds into the stock market. Doubling that is still significant.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            And you can do it as many times as you like, no charge*!

            * = charges may apply, see your local hedge fund for details