• Danquebec
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Can you imagine how specialized you would be if you only had one interest? Like the example non-ADD person just into politics… They must know the name of every representative at every level from city to country where they are living, know the detailed history of the political parties, and have a deep knowledge of political movements and their history.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s why most people are heavily propagandized and proselytized from a very early age to make sports their hobby. Indeed, these people tend to have deep knowledge of their team’s and their immediate opponent’s histories, with background going back to specific matches half a century ago and impressive retention of numbers and statistics thereof and so on.

      All this knowledge of course is absolutely useless politically (and often, socially), which is precisely the point.

      • Goudewup@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ehm no? What person or institution or organisation do you imagine going “harrr let’s get kids into sports so that they don’t bother to learn about politics harr!” exactly? Because it’s for sure not schools that are doing that. Most schools even teach about how politics work even.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Err, yes? Family and friends and massive amounts of peer pressure to belong. And Massive spending by the state towards such sports ofc.

          • Goudewup@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            7 months ago

            Just because a government subsidises sports (for example for health benefits) does not mean there is some nefarious plot to keep the populace from being involved in politics

            • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              The government building massive stadiums for people to watch sports is not for “health benefits”. Cmon now. This is typical “bread and circuses” stuff.

              And it doesn’t have to be a “nyah nyah nyah” twirling mustache guy thing. Fact of the matter is that the rise of professional sports just so happened to correlate to the rise of the nation state.