The article was written by a liberal. He, not me, is explaining what he believes is the problem with NPR. If you disagree with his viewpoint you should debate him.
Any conservative who doesn’t admit that there are ALSO conservatives that don’t “debate” with facts is clueless. They come to us from both sides. And in either case nothing is accomplished because you never get to understand the position of the other side. But in either case once the other party resorts to insults you know immediately that you are better off having a discussion with your dog.
And that’s the goal here to have discussions. I want to understand the viewpoint of a liberal. To me their stances are childish and illogical. Rarely can any of them it explain it, they just start hurling insults or buzzwords.
The article was written by a liberal. He, not me, is explaining what he believes is the problem with NPR. If you disagree with his viewpoint you should debate him.
Any conservative who doesn’t admit that there are ALSO conservatives that don’t “debate” with facts is clueless. They come to us from both sides. And in either case nothing is accomplished because you never get to understand the position of the other side. But in either case once the other party resorts to insults you know immediately that you are better off having a discussion with your dog.
And that’s the goal here to have discussions. I want to understand the viewpoint of a liberal. To me their stances are childish and illogical. Rarely can any of them it explain it, they just start hurling insults or buzzwords.