We say very clearly that rural America is hurting. But we refuse to justify attitudes that some scholars try to underplay.

Something remarkable happened among rural whites between the 2016 and 2020 elections: According to the Pew Research Center’s validated voter study, as the rest of the country moved away from Donald Trump, rural whites lurched toward him by nine points, from 62 percent to 71 percent support. And among the 100 counties where Trump performed best in 2016, almost all of them small and rural, he got a higher percentage of the vote in 91 of them in 2020. Yet Trump’s extraordinary rural white support—the most important story in rural politics in decades—is something many scholars and commentators are reluctant to explore in an honest way.

What isn’t said enough is that rural whites are being told to blame all the wrong people for their very real problems. As we argue in the book, Hollywood liberals didn’t destroy the family farm, college professors didn’t move manufacturing jobs overseas, immigrants didn’t pour opioids into rural communities, and critical race theory didn’t close hundreds of rural hospitals. When Republican politicians and the conservative media tell rural whites to aim their anger at those targets, it’s so they won’t ask why the people they keep electing haven’t done anything to improve life in their communities.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Perhaps we should look into kick starting and crowdfunding solar punk technocratic communes in rural middle america.

    Not to poo poo your fantasy or whatever, but this sounds like every tech bro’s “build an island country” when they get their first billion.

    Most cities weren’t built where they were purely by chance or coincidence. Infrastructure is hard and complicated to build, and relies on natural resources being somewhat available locally in most cases.

    Even if you manage to build it, there’s no guarantee they will come.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      In the very last sentence. And especially in the context in which we were discussing. It’s literally the opposite of that. Likely buying up rural land that had already been a town at one time but ceased to be because of industrialization. And revitalizing and rebuilding it in a more socialist / communist model along with other interested people. But still integrating into the larger society and environment around it. Building A Better Community from within. Not some outside Island to play King on.

      All these people fantasizing about 15 minute towns and cities here in the United states. Let’s fucking go let’s do it. Solar panels, windmills, tight high-density communities. The power that be don’t want it. We gotta do it ourselves.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        So you rebuilding the railroad? A lot of small towns only existed because of the railroad. Now some of them only exist because of the interstate.

        A lot of towns are rotting because there’s no real reason for them to exist anymore, and for some of them there wasn’t a real reason besides a truck stop for them to have existed in the first place.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          If it’s needed sure. But again there’s other avenues other ways. However you’re focusing on rebuilding them how they used to be. Not rebuilding them better or anew.

          These days we’d probably be better off building somewhere close to Interstate access. And then worrying more about data access. Than something like building our own private Railroad. Or railroad access in general.