• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      172 months ago

      Maybe raise a stink with your attorney general and/or representative, too. The whole idea that a company can sell licenses for something and then arbitrarily decide they don’t want to do it anymore and revoke all the licenses doesn’t sound legal. And if it is, it doesn’t sound like it should be.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      Is their removal of these licenses a measure to somehow prevent people from taking action?

      • Einar
        link
        fedilink
        222 months ago

        It’s not about this particular game.

        It’s about setting a precedent for games you do care about.

          • Einar
            link
            fedilink
            9
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Not in this case, seeing that progress is stored online.

            Who says that the game you care about tomorrow won’t do this next? Why be against an action/not care about something that can only benefit players now and in the long term?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -52 months ago

              The games I care about all already have backup options. They’re all the kinds of games that attract people like me who will just fix them right away.

              • Zoot
                link
                fedilink
                12 months ago

                I mean, God forbid Ubisoft gets its way and all games go this direction! Step up before you don’t get the choice to backup your games.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        172 months ago

        The idea is that since the company is French and France has excellent consumer protection, The Crew is the best example of this practice to fight

        It’s not about whether the game is good, it’s about Ubisoft being French

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        The Crew was great in its time. It was basically the bridge between Test Drive Unlimited (superior open world gameplay) and early Forza Horizon (superior driving physics). Later Forza Horizon games simply took all the good gameplay features from both TLU and The Crew and is unmatched in quality now.

        The Crew 2 was worse than both its predecessor and the competing Forza Horizon at that time, so if you were talking about that I’d half agree. But it’s still a problematic industry trend worth stopping.

  • Einar
    link
    fedilink
    662 months ago

    Digital “ownership”.

    Ubisoft is determined to take things one step further to stamp out any attempts to continue playing it past its expiry date.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Afaik nobody has cracked it as it’s always-online, though I’d be happily incorrect about this if one can slide me some sauce. I’m one of the affected players in the shutdown (still play occasionally) so the ability to continue playing this game would be very nice.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      112 months ago

      Afaik there is no crack for The Crew because it stored your progress on ubisoft’s server and has no local save data.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    512 months ago

    I can’t believe they double down on this. It seems ubisoft’s management actually thrives on gamers’ rage.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    272 months ago

    How the digital ownership normalized the fact that any service, game can disappear easily. The full digital future empowered the corporations, and that issue is here clearly shown by Ubisoft.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    24
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    release server software and let us self host!!!

    they dont even need to foot the cost for anything.

    • ඞmir
      link
      fedilink
      82 months ago

      That eats into their profits for their other/new games

    • Veraxus
      link
      fedilink
      132 months ago

      Been doing that for years. Will happily continue.

      But I’m just one person. Ubisoft won’t feel it unless hundreds of thousands more do the same.

      • all-knight-party
        link
        fedilink
        62 months ago

        Not the same thing at all. When the Crew is lost, a unique game and its world are lost with it. That’s like saying if you want to play something like Metal Gear Solid you can go play Hitman. They’re broadly the same genre, but a lot of unique art and experience is lost by just giving up and letting it go the easy way.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    192 months ago

    When Nintendo eshop closed, I lost all my purchases. I tried contacting Nintendo to see if they could transfer my purchases to my switch account, but contacting Nintendo is like trying to contact god, you’re gonna get nowhere

  • UndeadFoodSnob
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 months ago

    Thanks UbiSoft for rubbing it in my face with this message, “You no longer have access to this game. Why not check the Store to pursue your adventures?”

    • the post of tom joad
      link
      5
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Urhg that makes me mad to read.

      You no longer have access to my money. Why not kiss my ass Ubisoft, to pursue your adventure?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 months ago

      “Your single-payment rental period is suddenly over. Check out our shop where you can single-payment rent another game.”

      Fixed it for Ubisoft

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    92 months ago

    As if copies of a game on your computer is somehow more digital than the copy being on a disk or a chip that’s ROM.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      132 months ago

      Digital ownership, not storage. As in DRM, GaaS licensing and always-online launchers.

      A ROM cartridge was physical ownership, if you had the cartridge, you could play.

      A CD-key was also a form of physical ownership, install the game and type in the key from the case, you could play.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -3
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That should be “ownership” as actual ownership implies having control over a thing and no one who “purchased” this seems to have much control. Breaking the DRM and creating a self hosted sever is taking ownership of it. Don’t pretend CD keys were physical ownership either unless the key was entirely validated offline which admittedly older key schemes were.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    82 months ago

    The biggest reason I never bought this game. I didn’t know they’d go to this length, but knew that they’d be shutting off servers at some point and the game would be worthless. All that money anyone spent on it and the in-game items is now gone. All in Ubisoft’s pocket and all you’re left with is memories of playing the game. Wanna go back for some nostalgia? lol, no, fuck you. Just wait and hope a sequel will get released so they can continue the cycle.