US President Joe Biden has condemned Iranian attacks on military facilities in Israel, pledging a coordinated Group of Seven (G7) diplomatic response while highlighting the United States’s help in taking down “nearly all” of the attacking drones and missiles.

Biden, who cut short a trip to Delaware and returned to Washington, DC to meet advisers over the late Saturday night attack, said in a statement released by the White House that the US forces and facilities had not been hit.

The US president said he reiterated the “ironclad” support for Israel’s security in a call with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with whom he has had strained relations over Israel’s handling of the war in Gaza.

“Tomorrow, I will convene my fellow G7 leaders to coordinate a united diplomatic response to Iran’s brazen attack,” he said.

“And while we have not seen attacks on our forces or facilities today, we will remain vigilant to all threats and will not hesitate to take all necessary action to protect our people,” he said.

Archive link

    • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Jesus Christ the opening to that video had me guessing for a moment until I calmed down and realized it’s obviously a hypothetical. Given that it’s reported that Iranian officials consider their attack “concluded”, it would be great if all the players stepped away from escalation into open war. The video I linked talks about the pressure on both Iran and Israel to back down, and here’s hoping they do. The world really really doesn’t need yet another open war in the Middle East, USA-involved or otherwise.

    • sandman@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have no sympathy for any US soldiers who die defending genocidal states.

        • matcha_addict@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          They do get a choice. They willingly joined an organization with a terrible track record.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            After growing up in a soup of propaganda? Where many of them have no other means to escape poverty?

            And it would have a better track record if we didn’t use it so badly.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Yeah I’m talking about the track record. I’m not disputing that joining in the first place is a choice. It’s also only got that track record because of the people we elect.

            • matcha_addict@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              I highly doubt that there is no career option or field for them to go into other than mass murder. It doesn’t even pay that well! It’s just mid pay with good benefits.

              Would you excuse someone becoming a hitman for the money? A mass murderer is far worse.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Nope, not really. Not unless you get lucky. The US is really bad about the whole socioeconomic mobility thing. And the idea that everyone in the military is a murderer is debatable at best. You also haven’t really thought about the information environment in which a poor, badly educated, 18 year old reaches the recruiters office. They see the military as both a way out and a noble calling. And why wouldn’t they? People around them have put soldiers on pedestals their entire life.

                It’s not until later they get a look at what being in really means and by that point they’re trapped until the end of their enlistment. Which is why it’s on us to elect representatives that will stop abusing the military.

                • matcha_addict@lemy.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  If recruiters for hitmen and assassins were everywhere and reached everyone easily, I still wouldn’t sympathize with those who thought its a good idea. Even if the recruits were spreading propaganda, I will judge anyone who falls for it.

                  Do you apply the same logic to those who join islamist terror organizations? Most of these organizations use even more propaganda tactics. They prey on troubled young people and convince them that they are embarking on a righteous mission. Their propaganda is even more powerful as it relates to religion, which is closer to one’s heart than patriotism typically.

                  At least in the military, you will immediately see that whatever they promised you is wrong. You’ll immediately see you’re attacking other countries that aren’t a threat to your people. Terror organizations will still see people they were convinced to be sinners, standing in their way of establishing the kingdom of God.

                  I don’t sympathize with either

    • halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think it would be an incredibly unpopular decision by Biden, and the American people would not support a war with Iran. I also think that it would be a tactical mistake, given how many US assets are within Iranian striking distance right now. The US military is having recruiting issues currently, and a war will not help that.

      However, I wouldn’t be surprised to see ISIS attacks in Iran start to happen more frequently.

      • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Of course it will be more sanctions, more pressure to other countries to denounce Iran, more proxy war with funding literal terrorist groups and telling them to hit whoever the US doesn’t like, also probably bomb a few Iranian assests because what actually can they do?

        An open war rather requires justified claims. It is gruesome and the horrible results are directly tied to the war. A combination of sinister proxy war, subterfuge, coercion and forced poverty are slow killers and will have way fewer dissidents. It is the name of the game for half of the US oppression policing on the world.

      • The US military is even having materiel supply issues.

        What the fuck are they going to bomb Iran with? They lost all their weapons and ammo giving it to Ukraine to waste and for Israel to use for genocide. Honestly, Iran is going to wipe the fucking floor with US.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      US will play defense unless Iran does something really stupid and launches a large ballistic missile attack of some kind, or directly attacks US military. Even then, proportional response policy would probably mean strikes against missile facilities only.

      No amount of drones sent against Israel will result in the US opening an actual war with Iran.

  • LordOfLocksley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    What’s crazy about this whole situation is Iran attacked Israel because Israel bombed Iran’s embassy in Syria killing a general and 6 others… and governments are telling Iran not to overreact.

    Like bruh, how would you react if your embassy was bombed in a 3rd country killing your general and 6 other nationals

    • krolden@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 months ago

      And somehow the elected leader of our country is going against the will of the population by supporting israel and dragging us into another massive war.

  • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    Iran has kept their end of the bargain of not attacking US targets. Of course the US does not keep theirs of not interfering, and shoots down Iranian drones instead.

    In a written message to Washington, Iran “warned the US not to get dragged into Netanyahu’s trap”, Mohammad Jamshidi, the Iranian president’s deputy chief of staff for political affairs, wrote on X, referring to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The US should “step aside so that you don’t get hit”.

    “In response, the US asked Iran not to hit American targets,” Jamshidi said.

    • ReallyKinda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Related to bargaining, I read the wiki article on Iran’s nuclear program the other day and was surprised at how hard they are trying to do their nuclear program “by the book” while the US keeps blocking everyone else from agreeing that they’re entitled as long as they follow the guidelines (paris agreement etc).

      • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Literally this

        Iran needs to get nukes fast. The US will be itching for war until it does.

        • Cypher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          This is why I was cheering when North Korea got nukes.

          North Korea is a horrific shit show but war against North Korea would almost certainly end in direct conflict with China.

          Now that NK has nukes there is zero risk of the West initiating a conflict. The risk is too high.

          Any change in NK will need to happen internally or by pressure from their allies. Which sucks for the NK people but is probably still less horrific than war.

          • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The current problems in the DPRK stem from the brutal sanctions. Prior to the USSR’s overthrow when the sanctions had far less effect, the North was developing and urbanizing faster than the South, even with 20% of its population killed, and all its infrastructure destroyed, by the US.

            Agree with you on the nukes of course. The DPRK would’ve ended up like Libya is right now and the US might have been at war against China if they didn’t develop their nuclear deterrence.

            • Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              The highest managerial authority under the Taean system is the party committee. Each committee consists of approximately twenty-five to thirty-five members elected from the ranks of managers, workers, engineers, and the leadership of “working people’s organizations” at the factory.

              Workplace democracy in action.

            • livus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              7 months ago

              Well this has got to be one of the least persuasive things I’ve ever read:

              A measure of the success of the Taean Work System is its longevity and its continued endorsement by the leadership. In his 1991 New Year’s address marking the thirtieth anniversary of the creation of the system, Kim Il Sung said that the "Taean work system is the best system

            • Pascal@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Notice how you don’t address anything they said because it’s true.

              The US has been the only country genocidal enough to use a nuclear bomb on actual human beings, and they did it twice at that. Having a nuclear deterrence to keep such a war-mongering country out is important. And it’s been working as we can see.

        • mlg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Instructions unclear

          Got Pakistani COAS’s head stuck in Biden’s ***

    • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      The USA didn’t say they wouldn’t interfere. The opposite was said, actually. Iran has in fact targeted a US Base before although they did give warning ahead of time.

      You’re just making shit up OP.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Stop bailing Israel out. They literally bombed an embassy. They do not need the G7 to help them.

  • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    “All Joe Biden had to do was stay the fuck out of the middle east for a few months and the election was his…”

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The US has been tied to Israel since its founding.

      No matter who (or what party) was in the white house, the US would be propping up Isreal after the Hamas attack.

      Just like it has done for decades.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Same as Israel was always going to move on Palestine, we were always going to unequivocally support it.

      • DrZoidbergYes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Voting for a 3rd party is a vote for Trump. If you think Trump is less genocidal I have some magic beans to sell you.

          • SeaJ@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Sorry but that is not really how our system works. Feel free to advocate for changes to our voting like ranked choice but until then voting strategically is the only real way to go. Voting third party as a protest vote does not do shit. It does not get the Democratic party to change their platform. Vote for a progressive candidate in the primaries of you want something to actually change in the Democratic party. Neither major party actually cares about third parties. The last time a third party candidate got a large chunk of the vote was Perot and neither party changed positions afterwards.

            You can vote for a super progressive third party candidate in the election but that helps out the candidate least like your position if you are in a swing state. If you are not in a swing state, vote however the fuck you want because your vote largely means nothing until we change how voting works.

              • SeaJ@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. Coming to terms with the realities of first past the post is far from fascism. I actively advocate for voting systems that would make third parties viable. Until then, vote progressive in the primaries and send money to progressive candidates in the Democratic party to get them to change their platform. Voting for a different party altogether is not going to change their platform.

    • sandman@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      What do you mean? He knows young democrats will just fall in line no matter what he does because he’s not trump.

      • shikitohno@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        And if they don’t, he can count on other Democrats to try and browbeat them and shame them into voting for him no matter what he does, screeching, “But Trump!” as loud as they can.

        He sure is trying his best to make his actions indefensible to as wide a swath of the Democratic electorate as he can, now, and just banking on “Hey, I tossed you a few crumbs, and have you seen the other guy?”

        • Soulg
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Sure but that movement is full of shortsighted morons.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            They’re very clearly pushing Democrats and especially Biden on this issue.

            If it weren’t for the uncommitted movement I have no doubt that the US would have responded to Iran striking back at Israel.

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    There’s definitely something we ask don’t know about the US and Israel. There’s got to be some massive secret. Because there’s no other good explanation.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      Israel is the US’s unsinkable aircraft carrier in the Middle East. It’s strategically priceless for US world domination.

    • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Prob this thinking full as good way to stay in power. That or Isreal got a pee pee tape on someone. You should watch Canadian Bacon.

      • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        7 months ago

        Settler colonialism has nothing to do with religion.

        Palestine is merely good place for a colony since it’s a bridge between Asia and Africa; israel’s formation used common british colonization tactics [III], with companies literally named “Colonization Commission”, “Jewish Colonial Trust” and the like.

        Theodor Herzl, the founder of “zionism” was a racist who saw it as a rampart of the west in the region.

        “We should there form a portion of a rampart of Europe against Asia, an outpost of civilization as opposed to barbarism. We should as a neutral State remain in contact with all Europe, which would have to guarantee our existence.” Source [II]

        Only difference now is that the US has been the de facto leader of the imperial core since WW2, no longer UK in Europe. They are thus now israel’s main supporter.

  • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    “World’s biggest terrorist organisation supports genocidal sky-fairy worshippers”

    Oh, quelle surprise