There is a tendency among some academics to prescribe individual solutions to systemic problems, when those problems are men’s problems. For example, Diprete and Buchman, sociologists, in chapter 6 of the book “The Rise of Women: the growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools.” Write that boys get worse grades than girls because they have lower emotional attachment to school than girls do because male adolescent role models like Batman and James Bond don’t emphasize academic success, which fosters an adolescent male culture that is oppositional to school. The solutions that they propose in the conclusion to the chapter is for parents to provide their sons with information about the relationship between academic success and financial success and provide them with emotional rewards for academic success and for fathers to role model good study habits and ways of achieving financial success and masculinity through academic success to their sons. Andrew Reiner, who teaches men’s studies at Towson university in Maryland, says that men don’t go to other men for emotional support because male heroes in popular culture don’t do that. But that causes mental health problems for men. So he prescribes men to discuss what about masculinity to change with their male friends and for men to write about the emotions they experienced in the past, along with other recommendations for men. https://psyche.co/guides/how-to-be-a-man-who-has-inner-strength-and-emotional-resilience But what is missing from both accounts, is addressing the source of the problem. If the problem is the role models that boys and men see in the media don’t exhibit the behaviors that are necessary for them to thrive, then the solution is to change those role models. Telling individual men and families to change is just passing the buck. Those role models did not always exist. Someone created them on purpose. They can be changed. Is there something obvious that I am missing? Is it just impossible to make healthy and positive male role models profitable in fiction?
@Sewblon
Well, it goes against the deeply ingrained gender roles, in which men are expected to be stoic, resilient, and self-reliant. It is hard (but I would say not impossible) for men who do go to other men for emotional support to be seen as strong and healthy role models. It’s a challenge that I hope more creators will pick up.
@a-man-from-earth@kbin.social If those tropes (stoic, resilient, and self-reliant) were being perpetuated by persuasion or force, then that would make sense. But, that isn’t the case. Real men norms are in fact held up by pluralistic ignorance. i.e. most men don’t actually support them. But some men go along with them anyway because they mistakenly believe that most other men do. https://umatter.princeton.edu/respect-matters/healthy-masculinity Men don’t have a problem seeing such men as strong and healthy role models. They have a problem believing that other men do.