• Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The objective is to appear in the News, which will result in way more people becoming aware of just how many people are against what Israel is doing in Gaza and the US Administration’s support of it, which in turn will lead others to become more open about they themselves being against it since they will feel that “we are many” rather than “it’s just me” - grassroots movements independent of established politicial and media networks, no matter how many potential supporters they have, must be seen in order to grow otherwise they’ll just fizzle away and nothing will change.

    That usually means some kind of stunt in an important and highly public place which is almost certain to affect lots of members of the public.

    Barelly disturbing a handful of politicians as you suggest would not make the News unless the Press was already there for some other reason and it would still have to be some kind of stunt (think the Iraqi guy that threw his shoe at George Bush) for the Press to even mention it in the news.

    Unfortunatelly in the World we live in people have to use marketing strategies to merelly be seen, more so to have soap box to be heard by the rest of the nation, especially in Theatre Of Democracy countries were the “choice” is either pre-selected A or pre-selected B, and were the Press is not at all a Pillar Of Democracy independent of the Political Pillar but is pretty much joined at the hip with Political and/or Wealth Powers.

    If it had the kind of Political and Press environment were those things could just be done the way you naivelly (or maybe misleadingly) suggest, the US would be quite a different place in terms of Power, Voice and Representativeness and not one where the only electoral “choice” is between two genocide-loving presidential candidates.

    • sudo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Media attention is a failed outdated tactic.

      https://www.a15action.com/

      The proposal states that in each city, we will identify and blockade major choke points in the economy, focusing on points of production and circulation with the aim of causing the most economic impact, as did the port shutdowns in recent months in Oakland, California and Melbourne, Australia, as just a few examples.

      Hurting the rich’s pocket books is the only language they respect. Now I’m not sure blocking roads is the most effective form of this tactic. Usually you use labor unions. But they’re probably just working with what they have.

        • sudo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Media attention is a consequence of success that activists mistake for success itself. If you start seeking it out you’ll get caught in the trap of trying to control how the networks present you when you can’t control the networks at all. Pretty soon you’re doing useless shit like trying to levitate the Pentagon. Or worse, volunteering to get arrested en-masse.

    • guacupado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      That usually means some kind of stunt in an important and highly public place which is almost certain to affect lots of members of the public.

      Yeah, but you’re not getting public support. You’re getting the opposite.