• Billegh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yeah, not “incorrect,” just non-standard. The yardstick is: did your interpretation match the intended one? Clearly, he was able to get there so it’s firmly in “acceptable use.” Any further whinging about grammar is likely to just be construed as gatekeeping.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m a prescriptivist and I think it’s fine. I suspect it might be a British vs American English thing.

      • LordWarfire@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        As a native BrE speaker I’d say “I’ve X installed” is a little weird, fine in speech but written down it doesn’t look right. “I’ve installed X” is fine.

    • mnemonicmonkeys
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      The yardstick is: did your interpretation match the intended one?

      I think that’s just you. There’s a few examples of rules in English that aren’t required to get a point across, but sentences that break them sound grating. One such example is adjective order

      • Billegh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think you’re conflating correctness with comprehension. Even if it isn’t correct, you could still be understood.

        • mnemonicmonkeys
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Per your previous comment:

          Yeah, not “incorrect,” just non-standard. The yardstick is:

          Clearly, he was able to get there so it’s firmly in “acceptable use.”

          I’m not the one conflating the two concepts.