Speaker Mike Johnson’s elaborate plan for pushing aid to Ukraine through the House over his own party’s objections relies on an unusual strategy: He is counting on House Democrats and their leader, Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York, to provide the votes necessary to clear the way for it to come to the floor.

If Democrats were to provide those crucial votes, it would be the second time in two years that Republican leaders have had to turn to the minority party to rescue them from their own recalcitrant right-wing colleagues in order to allow major legislation to be debated and voted on.

. . .

That puts Democrats once again in a strange but strong position, wielding substantial influence over the measure, including which proposed changes, if any, are allowed to be voted on and how the foreign aid is structured. After all, Mr. Johnson knows that if they are unsatisfied and choose to withhold their votes, the legislation risks imploding before it even comes up.

MBFC
Archive

  • elliot_crane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    FTA:

    … it would be the second time in two years that Republican leaders have had to turn to the minority party to rescue them …

    Hmm that’s strange… it’s almost as if building your party platform on obstructionism and an ever-shrinking in-group is a bad way to accomplish things.

    E: added ellipses to make the quote fragment grammatically correct.

    • Zipitydew
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      I can’t wait to shit on Newt Gingrich’s grave.

  • jonne@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    And of course they only use their huge leverage to shovel more money to the arms industry instead of doing stuff for people, like the child tax credit, raising minimum wage or any of the hundreds of things Republicans have blocked.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      If it saves Ukraine from Russian occupation I’ll at least give them a favorable mention. Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        If they really wanted to win the war, they wouldn’t have delayed giving them tanks and F16s. This is more about bleeding Russia and selling arms than allowing Ukraine to win. And they’re finding out that Russia can bleed for a long time, something everyone seems to insist on learning the hard way over and over again.