I’ve seen them called “Stop Lines”, “Balk Line”, etc. The thick line painted on the road at a Stop Sign.

You’re supposed to stop before the line, but a lot of the time there’s a bush or other obstruction so you can’t see any crossing traffic. You have to creep forward until you can see anything.

Is there a reason for this? Is it done on purpose? It makes sense if there’s a crosswalk or something, but I see it a lot where there shouldn’t be any pedestrian activity.

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    8 months ago

    For stoplights, the stop line being comically far back is often so buses and trucks have room to make a big turn without colliding with your vehicle. If you’re at an intersection where the stop line is in an absurd place, it’s usually better to stop there rather than stopping wherever and running the risk of finding out why it is that you were supposed to stop way back.

    For stop signs, I have no idea. Maybe it means the traffic engineer was drunk that day or something; IDK.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      There is an intersection on the south side of providence RI that is like this and every single day someone is way out there like they supposed to stop up with the other two lanes and they end up trying to back up into a line of stopped cars while a city bus honks at them

      • walden@sub.wetshaving.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Now that you mention it, even if you stop at the stop line, it’s still very possible to not see any crossing traffic and then start creeping forward only for a bus to appear. By then it’s too late.

    • walden@sub.wetshaving.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The lines at intersections with traffic lights make sense to me, especially since they all have crosswalks, etc. in my area.