• honeyontoast@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What fascinates me about these things is, if it is “about” to go supernova, then it already has, hundreds of years ago. We just haven’t seen it yet.

  • Shrek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is exciting that in this case “soon” could mean tens of years instead of hundreds of thousands.

  • wintrparkgrl@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This would be amazing to see in my lifetime. I have a 10 inch telescope I use to mostly look at the planets, but this would be big/bright enough to see clearly with it

      • wintrparkgrl@beehaw.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        From what I read it would be as bright/slightly brighter than a full moon for a few months. I would have to use my moon filter to not be blinded by looking in the telescope

  • CatWrangler@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hmm that’s neat, from the article “We conclude that Betelgeuse is in the late stage of core carbon burning, and a good candidate for the next Galactic supernova,”

    That would be wild to witness a supernova.

  • alexdoom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It would be crazy cool to see it go supernova, safe from most of the harmful effects and bright enough to light the way at night.

      • soiling@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        no, I think it would only be potentially harmful if its poles were pointed directly at us and we were blasted with gamma ray bursts