• wildbus8979
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nah it’s just that it uses blockchain technology for some reason (hype I guess), but it’s not coin related. (Blockchains can be used for other purposes than money).

      • warmaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        The Blockhain idea is actually great, crypto-currency is the scam. People need to learn differentiate.

        • erwan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I have yet to see any Blockchain application that wouldn’t be better without a Blockchain

        • wildbus8979
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yup, for example it can be used to provide distributed authentication

          • warmaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Or leave an audit trail for a logistics business for example.

            There are a gazillion use cases, most overlooked because of the coin stench.

              • 9bananas@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                not necessarily, but it can be a good idea to have a distributed, tamper proof ledger of transactions.

                that way anyone can provide proof for basically anything to do with the service: payment, drive, location, etc.

                it might also have advantages from a security perspective for riders and drivers.

                there are advantages, they’re not entirely necessary, but they may well be the best option for a distributed network (i.e.: no central server infrastructure, at least not beyond some simple software repository for downloads/updates)

                • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  It’s the cryptocurrency that keeps it tamper proof.

                  Any blockchain can be altered they aren’t immutable by nature.

                  What keeps it immutable is the incentive provided and to not cheat so you can get that incentive.

                  The whole thing is trustless and everyone is working together aligned on the incentive.

                  If it doesn’t cost resources to secure the chain (which get recouped by the reward) anyone could just spin up a bazillion nodes and take control of the chain and alter the records. And anyone could collide to do so with others to benefit themselves by altering it if they aren’t risking a reward, or in PoS, their stake.

                  If it’s a small private blockchain to just keep track of data, people could collude and alter it and it could just be a write only dB with a few admins

                  What Satoshi did, was invent a way to make a digital item immutable, that was the invention. There were no immutable digital items prior to that. A blockchain isn’t just immutable because it’s a blockchain.