squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 年前rule 📏lemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square55linkfedilinkarrow-up1356arrow-down10
arrow-up1356arrow-down1imagerule 📏lemmy.blahaj.zonesquirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 年前message-square55linkfedilink
minus-squareBearGun@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up22·1 年前Well it’s likely short for “authorities on the subject”, i.e. experts.
minus-squareRubanski@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 年前Probably, I just found the change of wording curious
minus-squareℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·1 年前It’s the evolution of the language. One would appeal to an “authority” for an educated opinion. For example the standard fallacy name “faulty appeal to authority,” where information is posed as authoritative but is, in actuality, from a layperson.
Well it’s likely short for “authorities on the subject”, i.e. experts.
Probably, I just found the change of wording curious
It’s the evolution of the language. One would appeal to an “authority” for an educated opinion. For example the standard fallacy name “faulty appeal to authority,” where information is posed as authoritative but is, in actuality, from a layperson.