Why Microsoft is a national security threat
www.theregister.com
With little competition at the goverment level, Windows giant has no incentive to make its systems safer
  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldBEnglish
    6·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:

    Interview Microsoft has a shocking level of control over IT within the US federal government – so much so that former senior White House cyber policy director AJ Grotto thinks it’s fair to call Redmond’s recent security failures a national security issue.

    Grotto this week spoke with The Register in an interview you can watch below, in which he told us that exacting even slight concessions from Microsoft has been a major fight for the Feds.

    “If you go back to the SolarWinds episode from a few years ago … [Microsoft] was essentially up-selling logging capability to federal agencies” instead of making it the default, Grotto said.

    Grotto told us Microsoft had to be “dragged kicking and screaming” to provide logging capabilities to the government by default, and given the fact the mega-corp banked around $20 billion in revenue from security services last year, the concession was minimal at best.

    Add to that concerns over an Exchange Online intrusion by Chinese snoops, and another Microsoft security breach by Russian cyber operatives, both of which allowed spies to gain access to US government emails, and Grotto says it’s fair to classify Microsoft and its products as a national security concern.

    But what can be done to solve the problem when 85 percent of US government productivity software, by Grotto’s reckoning, and even more operating system share, belongs to Redmond?

    The original article contains 352 words, the summary contains 228 words. Saved 35%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • nkat2112English
    4·
    7 months ago

    Yes.

    I quite think this was well known for a number of years.