A “natural language query” search engine is what I need sometimes.

Edit: directly reachable with the !ai bang

  • Vendetta9076
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Rule or trend, whatever word you use is semantics at this point. And your experience is irrelevant to the facts of how all current LLM’s are built. They are all built the same way. We have proof they are all built the same way.

    If you talk to someone and you know they lie to you 10% of the time, would you ever take anything they day at face value?

    We can sit down and speculate all day about what could be but that has no bearing on what is which is the entire point of this discussion.

    • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Rule or trend, whatever word you use is semantics at this point.

      Hardly. There is a very clear distinction between a rule & a trend.

      And your experience is irrelevant to the facts of how all current LLM’s are built. They are all built the same way. We have proof they are all built the same way.

      They are not all built the same, though. Claude, for instance, is built with a framework of values called “Constitutional AI”. It’s not perfect, as the developers even state, but it is a genuine step in the right direction compared to many of its contemporaries in the AI space.

      If you talk to someone and you know they lie to you 10% of the time, would you ever take anything they day at face value?

      Humans are not tools that can be improved upon. They are sentient beings that have conscious choice. LLMs are the former, and are not the latter.

      They are not 1:1 comparisons as you claim.