• bobburger@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 个月前

      Jury Nullification is a power tool that people don’t use enough.

      Jury nullification (US/UK), jury equity[1][2] (UK), or a perverse verdict (UK)[3][4] occurs when the jury in a criminal trial gives a not guilty verdict regardless of whether they believe a defendant has broken the law. The jury’s reasons may include the belief that the law itself is unjust,[5][6] that the prosecutor has misapplied the law in the defendant’s case,[7] that the punishment for breaking the law is too harsh, or general frustrations with the criminal justice system. Some juries have also refused to convict due to their own prejudices in favor of the defendant.[8] Such verdicts are possible because a jury has an absolute right to return any verdict it chooses.[9]

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      11 个月前

      Shut the fuck up delete this! If you say things like that second paragraph publicly, it can get you kicked out in voir dire.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          11 个月前

          Then what’s the point of writing “if I’m sitting on a Jury…” when the rest of the sentence torpedoes your ability to ever be on one?

          • zaph
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            11 个月前

            If lawyers are scrubbing Lemmy posts for jury selection I’m sure they will find more reasons than “this dude might pull jury nullification.”

          • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 个月前

            You are vastly overestimating the government’s effort when it comes to juror vetting.