• explodicle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    There would be other animals there instead

      • explodicle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Who set the goalposts of cows only? If we’re playing logical fallacy bingo, then that’s a straw man.

        • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Okay, I’ll be serious for a moment because logical consistency is important to me.

          I am responding to the image above. The image above is making the suggestion that higher rates of veganism means that cows will get to live. I am not arguing here in any capacity that we should only care about cows, I am making the statement that the premise suggested in the image, that there are cows that would be alive if there were more vegans is flawed at best.

          • explodicle
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            If the image showed a fox, you’d be saying they think you eat foxes. It’s not a good faith interpretation of the argument being presented - you might as well infer that they’re only talking about men in suits, too.