• sugar_in_your_tea
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Here’s the bill (Division H is the relevant part).

    I misread “internet hosting service” in the initial section as “Internet service,” so I’m guessing it doesn’t obligate ISPs to block TikTok or any other service.

    It does block server hosts from allowing distribution of blocked apps though. So no local mirrors of the app.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Right they define internet hosting service as:

      (5) INTERNET HOSTING SERVICE.—The term “internet hosting service” means a service through which storage and computing resources are provided to an individual or organization for the accommodation and maintenance of 1 or more websites or online services, and which may include file hosting, domain name server hosting, cloud hosting, and virtual private server hosting.

      So this would prevent a US organization like AWS, Oracle, etc from hosting the TikTok user data as long as TikTok is owned or a subsidiary of ByteDance or another “foreign adversary”.

      Elsewhere in the text, they exclude “service providers” from restrictions, so it seems like ISPs are not going to block requests to TikTok.

      • sugar_in_your_tea
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yup, that’s my read too after a review.

        I honestly kinda skimmed that part initially because I was more interested in how it could impact other apps. I don’t particularly care about TikTok, I just wanted to know what other apps could be targeted and what the process for that looks like.