• slurpyslop@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      8 months ago

      voting for a government that’s enabling a genocide is voting for that genocide to continue, no matter how you decide to answer on a poll

      • vaultdweller013
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        We’re in a representative democracy that takes a couple years for all elected positions within a government to change completely assuming every person in said government was voted out. So I ask you, why the fuck would you assume massive change of policy and position within a year? Especially since support for Israel was pretty widespread for the better part of eighty years.

        • slurpyslop@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          why would you assume a change of policy at all over any timescale if you keep electing people propping up a genocide?

          • vaultdweller013
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            8 months ago

            Did ya fucken read my comment, most Americans werent aware of the genocide up until relatively recently. Even then traction against Israel has only built up within less than a fucken year, and I shall restate that the US has been backing Israel for longer than most people have been alive at this point. Why the fuck would you expect substantial change before theres even been an election.

            • slurpyslop@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              why would you expect substantial change at any point if you re-elect a party after they spent a year propping up a genocide?

              • vaultdweller013
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                8 months ago

                Bit of a shit situation is what I call it, we have two parties who are worth shit. One is violently genocidal both at home and abroad, while the other is only mildly genocidal abroad. Sorry to break it to you mate but there is only one effective choice.

                And before ya come at me, imma just gonna point out that I fucken hate this fact. Im a socialist Redneck my ilk have been dealing with shit deals for over a hundred years, but the reason there are socialist Rednecks still around is cause pragmatism is a far more effective tool than throwing a hissy fit and checking out.

                I dont like the shit pie but its far more effective than standing up and letting the shaped charage under my ass go off.

                • slurpyslop@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  continuing to vote for the mildly genocidal party is not going to make the mildly genocidal party less genocidal

                  • vaultdweller013
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    It can if ya vote in the primaries. The fact of the matter is that the parties didnt switch back in the 50s for no reason. The people winning the primaries swapped.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’ve got one side sending food and clean water while the other side advocates Netanyahu “finish the job”, but sure “both sides bad” about it all you want.

                • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I mean, you’re clearly not willing to be rational on this, or you would never have brought it up.

                  What do you want me to do, waste my time researching the daily operating costs? Spend hours hunting sources you’ll just tl;Dr?

                  What’s the point? Even if you’re right, it’s irrelevant.

                  What costs more, a bullet, or the medical care to recover from being shot? How much credit do you want to give someone for killing a hundred people while forcing a thousand out of their homes just because they only almost let the thousand starve to death in a refugee camp run by rapists?

        • slurpyslop@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          you can talk around it with all the mental gymnastics you like, but ultimately voting for biden is a signal to the democratic party that their base doesn’t care about genocide enough to not vote for him, which is all they care about

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            And not voting for Biden resulting in a Trump victory signals an immediate end to Palestinians, among many other horrible atrocities to come as the US declines into a mix of Plutocracy and Evangelical Theocracy.

            • slurpyslop@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              implying palestine will last until january

              oh ho ho

              if you’re fine with the trade off, make the trade off and vote biden

              just don’t pretend the trade off isn’t happening

              • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                There is urgency for every single life at risk in this conflict, but it’s not debateable that Palestine absolutely will exist in January and that the differences in US Admin could very well be the difference of hundreds of thousands of lives following the election.

                • slurpyslop@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  i don’t think the current round of genocide will last until january, no, whether or not a state called palestine is left standing or not

                  you’re trading in the lives of the next palestine