• Chakravanti
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        No. Their existence scares shit out of everyone else to work hard for piss money.

        • daellat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          So the solution is cost effective like my initial statement said and youre just arguing for arguments sake? Idgi

          • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I don’t get what you did with all the time you saved by typing “Idgi” instead of “I don’t get it”.

          • Chakravanti
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            You mean “cost” as in the cost of the collective people. Such is not given a fuck about by anyone with enough to not be a communist. That and such wealth would give zero fucks if it weren’t for the fact that this level of wealth can, instead of forcing people, simply buy anything to be done that is delirious, disgusting and more that even I don’t want to talk about here.

            At the end of the day it become the choice of every individual who doesn’t want to die to sell their kid to Bill Gates who will do you know what.

            • daellat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              I just meant that in terms of tax payer money offering homeless people cheap free housing is not more expensive than not doing that and having all these other costs go up to combat the symptoms nothing more.