The western values Ukraine is defending are becoming more apparent by the day.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    Alright, let’s roll with that logic: A sovereign government that violates the sovereignty of it’s citizens is illegitimate. Since Ukraine is now violating the sovereignty of it’s citizens for wartime mobilization, it is an illegitimate government. That’s a sound premise, actually. In a vacuum this would be true.

    However, that completely loses the nuance that Ukraine is not the aggressor in this “senseless war”. Ukraine did not violate it’s citizen’s sovereignty, RUSSIA DID by initiating the war of annexation against the sovereign government of Ukraine. By violating the sovereignty of the government, Russia thus violated the sovereignty of every citizen under that government. None of this would have been necessary had the initial aggression not been committed.
    So, now extend your argument: Let’s go ahead and accuse Ukraine of violating human rights with this expansion of power. You must also do so for Russia, who backed Ukraine into this corner in the first place, and who is also committing infinitely worse violations against the civilian territory they have thus far annexed. Are you willing to do that? Because so far, you haven’t.

    You seem to be echoing a large number of Russian propaganda points trying to paint Ukraine as some fascist shithole, and not the independent nation being overrun by a expansionist dictatorship that it is. This argument is not in good faith.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      However, that completely loses the nuance that Ukraine is not the aggressor in this “senseless war”.

      Weird, last I checked Ukraine was involved in a war against Donbas since 2014 as even western media reported at the time.

      Ukraine did not violate it’s citizen’s sovereignty, RUSSIA DID by initiating the war of annexation against the sovereign government of Ukraine.

      And if people of Ukraine wanted to defend the state then they would be voluntarily fighting to do so.

      By violating the sovereignty of the government, Russia thus violated the sovereignty of every citizen under that government. None of this would have been necessary had the initial aggression not been committed.

      None of that has anything to do with the western sponsored regime in Ukraine forcing people to fight Russia for western interests.

      So, now extend your argument: Let’s go ahead and accuse Ukraine of violating human rights with this expansion of power. You must also do so for Russia, who backed Ukraine into this corner in the first place, and who is also committing infinitely worse violations against the civilian territory they have thus far annexed. Are you willing to do that? Because so far, you haven’t.

      The premise the west peddles is that Ukraine is defending western values against Russia which is already presumed to be bad. However, if it turns out that Ukraine is doing the same things you claim are bad when Russia is doing, then what values is Ukraine defending exactly?

      Turns out this conflict isn’t about values it all, it’s about whose sphere of influence Ukraine is going to be under.

      You seem to be echoing a large number of Russian propaganda points trying to paint Ukraine as some fascist shithole, and not the independent nation being overrun by a expansionist dictatorship that it is. This argument is not in good faith.

      Meanwhile, you’re making an incoherent argument that doesn’t make a lick of sense trying to defend literal fascism in Ukraine.

      • xionzui
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        Weird, last I checked Ukraine was involved in a war against Donbas since 2014 as even western media reported at the time.

        It’s almost like Russia has expressed its desire to annex Ukraine for over a decade now and has been sending disguised military units to create a “resistance” to fabricate a justification for “liberating” parts of Ukraine into Russian territory. Weird… It’s not like they explicitly gave that as one of the 20 conflicting reasons for this invasion or anything

    • robinnn [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It literally is a fascist shithole. It’s littered with monuments to Nazis and Nazi collaborators, it’s armed forces are filled with Nazis, its leadership pays homage to Nazi collaborators, and the entire reason we’re in this situation is the US-backed coup in 2014 of which Nazis were the prime domestic force, and which led to the proliferation of Nazi gangs. Ukraine is not an independent nation.

      You talk about Russia violating sovereignty, what about the Ukrainian bombing of the Donbas (illegal cluster munitions used) and repeated violations of ceasefires? Russia didn’t invade Ukraine out of the blue, they had specific demands for the end of far-right nationalism, repression of Russian speakers, and NATO expansion (NATO itself being a Nazi collaborationist institution).

        • robinnn [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t care if my comment is “normal,” but it is “rational and source-supported.” You’re not “calling out hexbear users,” you’re flaunting your ignorance. Points sourced one by one:

          It’s littered with monuments to Nazis and Nazi collaborators [*] [*]

          its armed forces are filled with Nazis [*] [*] [*]

          Tweet by the National Guard of Ukraine:

          its leadership pays homage to Nazi collaborators [*] [*] [*]

          and the entire reason we’re in this situation is the US-backed coup in 2014 of which Nazis were the prime domestic force [*] [*]

          and which led to the proliferation of Nazi gangs [*] [*]

          (illegal cluster munitions used) and repeated violations of ceasefires [*] [*]

          they had specific demands for the end of far-right nationalism, repression of Russian speakers, and NATO expansion [*] [*]

          NATO itself being a Nazi collaborationist institution [*] [*]

          • QuietCupcake [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            8 months ago

            I just want to thank you and @[email protected] for the time and effort you put into these heavily-sourced and informative comments. Even if these lying, willfully ignorant shitlibs can’t appreciate it because it so clearly demonstrates how wrong they are and how little they know, some of us reading do appreciate it. I’ve learned a lot as a result and am better equipped to help others who might be willing to try to better understand the situation too.

            • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              lying, willfully ignorant shitlibs

              Not everyone in the audience is that. I was a Burgerland lib once, too, exposed to the exact same propaganda for decades, so I know at least some can break out of it, if they’re curious & intellectually honest.

              After witnessing in real time how obviously fabricated the justification for the Iraq War was, and how seemingly credulously the media propagated it, I was no longer able to ignore the cracks in the propaganda. It still took me many, many years to peel away layer after layer. It’s a process. I’m just trying to help people get there faster than I did. The dissonance between what’s happening in Gaza & the West Bank right now and Western governments’ & corporate media’s coverage of it is even harder to ignore than the Iraqi WMD lies were twenty years ago, so this is an opportune moment for others.

              • QuietCupcake [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                8 months ago

                Not everyone in the audience is that.

                For sure, and I hope it didn’t look like I was implying that. It’s why I made a point to say that “some of us reading” appreciate your commentary. The “lying, willfully ignorant” thing was referring specifically to Unruffled and empireOfLove who you and robinnn were replying to respectively. The long process of questioning propaganda and the widening cracks that you describe is similar to my own experience, and I even commented recently about how the purpose of debating people in these online threads is rarely to change the mind of the person you’re arguing with, but rather to speak to the audience and plant the seeds that their doubt will hopefully grow from over time.

                • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Yup, you totally get it. I doubt I’ll see the fruits of my labor on a pseudonymous social media platform, and I’m okay with that.

          • PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocksB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

            *

            Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

            I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

        • robinnn [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          @[email protected] Your comment has been up for over four hours, so 0 for 1 on predictions. I gave you citations for what I said in my comment, things you would have known if you would’ve looked into the conflict at all. You were so concerned with “discourse based in logic” and “source-supported comments,” so what happened?

          It’s extremely scummy to imply I’m a liar or making stuff up, then when I go and prove what I’ve said, you can’t even respond to apologize. If your comment was just a dishonest method of wasting my time, then you should be banned and have your comment removed.

          • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            8 months ago

            I wish just once that one of these “market place of ideas-facts and logic-rational source-supported” lib debate perverts would actually engage with your posts. You always have tons of sources for everything and you cite them in posts like its an MLA style essay, and then these libs just ignore it.

            I know “rational discource-logic-source supported” are just affectations for these people, but they clearly don’t even care about trying to appear like its anything more than that

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You seem to be echoing a large number of Russian propaganda points trying to paint Ukraine as some fascist shithole



      Edit to add: Usually someone responds with, yeah well Russia has fascists, too, to which I usually respond:

      There are Russian fascists. Take Navalny, for example, who the US tried to use in its regime change efforts so that it could resume its neoliberal shock therapy plundering that started under Yeltsin and ended under Putin.

      • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        8 months ago

        Quoting Internationalist 360° as a reliable source isn’t going to win anyone over. And the ‘The Hill’ article you listed concludes something that is the opposite of what you are claiming:

        The odious Russian media tried to paint Ukraine as a land of Nazis, though that is patently wrong. Ukraine has a thriving Jewish community, and its far-right is still on the fringe.

        We all understand your point of view, everyone’s a Nazi if they are against Russian/Chinese imperialism.

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          We all understand your point of view, everyone’s a Nazi if they are against Russian/Chinese imperialism.

          I don’t think that at all. Being “against” Russia or China doesn’t per-se make someone a fascist. I’m not confused about what fascism is, and I don’t use it as a floating signifier for stuff I don’t like.

          But neither Russia nor China is imperialist. The imperial core is imperialist, otherwise known as the Global North.

          .
          Over 20 years go Russia—at the time lead by Putin—wanted to join the imperialism club, but the US rejected them: Ex-Nato head says Putin wanted to join alliance early on in his rule. Now Russia, rejected by the Global North, has no choice but to join with the Global South as allies instead. This shift in allegiances has been massively accelerated by the sanctions of this war.

          Ukraine has a thriving Jewish community

          So fascism means hating Jews? What about the fascists genociding Palestinians in Israel as we speak?

        • robinnn [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          8 months ago

          Notice that point from “The Hill” has no examples or evidence. It’s not relevant; they were citing the examples given not the author’s out-of-the-blue conclusion (which can be chalked up to the counter-bias that was the reason it was cited). I have another comment on this post proving that the far-right is not “still on the fringe.”

          Quoting Internationalist 360° as a reliable source isn’t going to win anyone over.

          Oh, I see the issue: you don’t understand how sources work. They’re not citing Internationalist 360° as a reliable source by itself—if you would’ve read until the end of the article you would’ve seen that the author provided a list of sources used. The article is simply a summary of the history using those sources.

          Please tell me about “Chinese imperialism.” I’d love to hear about how Chinese investment in Africa, the only FDI with a positive impact on development, is “imperialism.” I’d love to hear how the PRC’s claim to Taiwan, despite being accepted by nearly every country on earth and recognized by the UN (and favored upon by the majority of Taiwanese despite no clear support for total reunification, hence its not happening yet when China could conceivably force it upon the population), the US admitting that their cynical support for separatism is only to keep the PRC down, is “imperialism,” and in fact Taiwan is an independent state with no relation to China (despite its constitution being the Constitution of the Republic of China, and its president the president of the Republic of China, with the so-called ROC claiming sovereignty over all of the mainland of China, Outer Mongolia, and Russia—see the emblem of the ROC Marine Corps).

        • zkrzsz [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          We all understand your point of view, everyone’s a Nazi if they are against Russian/Chinese imperialism.