Google layoffs: The company plans to set up a new team in Munich, Germany which would act as “cheaper” labour, the report claimed.

  • danielfgom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    The only staff who need firing is Sundar. Google and android should have been easy better by now but he made them stagnant.

    Android is still the best mobile os but it could have been even better under better leadership. Plus they could have enabled and experimented with the OEM’s to allow for additional hardware buttons, button remapping, a native Dex on all Androids, official gcam port to all OEM’s so they don’t need to make their own camera algorithms and even the cheapest droid could have had flagship level cameras.

    And we haven’t even touched on software yet…

    Fire his useless ass

    • ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why would it be in googles interest to provide better cameras to OEMs? Google has to love that people buy pixel phones because other vendors cameras are years behind

      • emergencyfood
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Pixels are a minuscule fraction of Android devices. Google would get more money by improving Android than by trying to increase their own marketshare.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Because the market is bigger than Pixels and they could license much of it (I’d like to see more of it as open source, but it’s easier for a corporation to justify licensing the cutting edge stuff). I think a lot of OEMs would like access to Night Sight

      • nasduia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Regardless of the actual software processing details, in the wider population of Android consumers I’m pretty sure it’s Samsung that has the reputation for photography.

        Samsung’s advertising focus is on advertising things that people understand and think they want, not AI assistants and cleaner versions of Android. Most of the reviews of the Pixel 8 criticise no telephoto lens while Samsung tends to have an excess being shown off.

        Like everything Google does, I’m not sure it is any good at understanding people as humans rather than people as aggregate statistical models and that shows in its consumer devices.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Samsung’s 10x camera is amazing, I’m pretty miffed they dropped down to a digial zoom 10x though and made it a 5x on the S24 series, even if it gives other benefits like higher quality mid zooms between the 3x and 10x.

          I really hope they bring it back or someone else has a good 10x lens by the time I need a new phone.

          Fuck only having a 3x after having a 10x