• Dandroid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Most games I like are 2D, so that’s kind of a weird statement. I grew up on SNES, though. My family skipped the N64, so I didn’t even get a 3D console until the GameCube… Which I didn’t even get until years after it launched.

      • Dandroid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Different strokes, I suppose. I have never cared for graphics in a game. I don’t care today, I didn’t care when I was playing Super Mario World as a kid. I care far more about gameplay, tight controls, and later in life I started caring more about good narrative. The best looking game in the world wouldn’t keep my attention if the controls felt like garbage, or if the gameplay was just plain boring.

        • AlolanYoda@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I care about graphics in games (although mostly due to art direction rather than just “realism”). And yet I still agree with you and think the other guy is bonkers. 2D games can be awesome, 3D games can be awesome.

      • SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Far be it from me to speak to the validity of your feelings. But, to me, that seems like a bit of a massive over generalization. Many 3D games look like shit, many look amazing. Many 2D games look like shit, many look amazing.

        I mean, saying a 3D game like Gollum looks better than a 2D game like Hollow Knight, just because it’s 3D sounds insane to me.