- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
After concurring with each of the six recommendations in the inspector general’s report, Koerner made the following comment:
“NASA is dedicated to continuous enhancement of our processes and procedures to ensure safety and address potential risks and deficiencies,” she wrote. “However, the redundancy in the above recommendations does not help to ensure whether NASA’s programs are organized, managed, and implemented economically, effectively, and efficiently.”
A careful reading of the second sentence reveals that Koerner feels that the inspector general’s efforts are both redundant and unhelpful. This is not accidental language. Koerner’s response was certainly reviewed by NASA’s senior managers, who could have flagged and removed the text. And yet they went through with it.
NASA: “Ugh, we know”
Everyone else: “um, wtf??”