• umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    i appreciate ff can do this and all, but isnt this usecase covered by you know, the browser history?

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I find bookmarks simply useless compared to tabs. Massive cognitive burden to sort and categorize. Also can’t search the content text.

        I prefer textfiles full of urls more than bookmarks

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I find bookmarks simply useless compared to tabs. Massive cognitive burden to sort and categorize. Also can’t search the content text.

        I prefer textfiles full of urls more than bookmarks

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Don’t be, I normally have no more than 3, no more than 7 when actively multitasking

    • hackerwacker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well, no. Firefox deletes entries older than 6 months from history and there’s no way to change this or to export the data.

          • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            They said you can merge without conflicts:

            Making a backup every 60 days seems to be sufficient to keep all history. sqlite doesn’t reuse old ids (I think?) so merging the backups shouldn’t be too hard.

            But they haven’t tested it, also I wonder if once you do that successfully, Firefox will just delete all the extra records at the next startup, so idk

            • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              The entries would still be datestamped and as firefox clears up the history the older ones would be deleted.

              In my other comment I linked something that said firefox just starts tidying up as performance starts to degrade, rather than a fixed limit of history entries.

              Therefore, if your history is more or less full, and you just import a heap more history, firefox is just going to “tidy up” everything you just imported surely.

      • mac@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        You can change how often it deletes history items, I’m sure I’ve done that before