I remember during covid I thought one silver lining type thing would be many many more people having to experience the shitty way the Australian government treats unemployed people who need help. Of course they got around this by temporarily changing it, which to me was a stark admission that it was totally inadequate in the first place.
deleted by creator
Yes exactly it’s extremely frustrating. Everyone just forgot because it was ok for them when they needed help. If the system was actually working properly it wouldn’t require any changes for an event like covid.
Because we make national sport out of kicking the shit out of people doing it rough. You will serve or you will die, citizen
Because everyone on the sole is lazy. Except when we need assistance in which case we’re just a battler needing help, but everyone else is lazy.
Love this line:
“For some reason, it released the report on the Friday between Anzac Day and the weekend, so it didn’t get much media coverage.”
Can’t be seen helping poor people. Can’t admit you’re not helping them either.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
"Such demonstrably false premises lead inevitably to poor public policy, with services that are often harmful, unfair, complex, costly to administer, counterproductive and bound to fail.
The original article contains 26 words, the summary contains 26 words. Saved 0%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Hey @[email protected], the bot seems to be having some difficulties with correctly parsing articles from the ABC. It’s been doing it on a fair few posts (see below examples as well). As far as I can tell, it’s only occuring on articles from the ABC and I’m not entirely sure what’s causing it.
Other examples:
Thanks for the report! It’s fixed now.
Thank you!
It looks like ABC must have changed the internal layout of their pages for whatever reason. It seems like the bot is just selecting the first block quote as the entire article.
On The Register for example it selects the div with the id
#body. For ABC it seems that it looks for the classArticle_Bodywhich I can’t find on that article. I might have a closer look later if I’ve got some time and try to get a PR in if it doesn’t get fixed.That’s the case, they removed one level of nesting from the html. Anyway, it doesn’t look for
Article_Bodyclass, but any class that starts withArticle_Body. They’re using randomized class names with the prefix being constant, that’s why I have to do it that way. I’ve updated it to this horrible looking selector:div[class*="Article_body"] > div > p, div[class*="Article_body"] > div > ul:not([class*="ShareUtility"]) > li.Thanks! I thought it might’ve been a wildcard thing but wasn’t sure. They really don’t want their articles summarised do they (or they’re probably trying to discourage AI scrapers)
