• ceasarlegsvin
    link
    fedilink
    10813 days ago
    • run a speed test on my quantum computer so I know how fast it’s running

    • it vanishes without a trace

  • MxM111
    link
    fedilink
    3413 days ago

    Well, your quantum twin observed the opposite. Be glad for him.

      • @jnk
        link
        1213 days ago

        Wait does that mean we have multiversal networking?

        … I don’t know how this is the first thing that went through my mind, but i bet there is a self-datintg app already. You can bonk me now.

          • @jnk
            link
            312 days ago

            Not me, but maybe “me” actually does idk

        • MxM111
          link
          fedilink
          312 days ago

          Quantum dating. A very quick and uncertain date.

  • r00ty
    link
    fedilink
    2113 days ago

    This would only happen if you tried to delid the quantum CPU. So, not only is it bricked, but you also voided the warranty!

  • Hjalmar
    link
    fedilink
    1712 days ago

    The trick is to not observe it but to simply glance over it as if you didn’t give a f*ck about it and pretend like your simply trying to avoid walking into it. Look right at it and you may hurt it’s feelings causing it to brick itself

    THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT A COMPLETE GUIDE TO HANDLING A QUANTUM COMPUTER. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY HARM THAT YOU MAY CAUSE TO YOURSELF OR THE SPACE TIME AROUND. QUANTUM COMPUTERS ARE DANGEROUS AND HURTING THERE FEELINGS MAY CAUSE IMMEDIATE DESTRUCTION OF THE SPACETIME AROUND THEM.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      513 days ago

      That’ll be bout treefiddy, and if you change your mind and decide you do want the electron gun eyeball treatment…another treefiddy

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    812 days ago

    I’ve never understood what counts as ‘observing’ in this context… Just looking at the thing, perhaps with some kind of microscope/tool? Does it have to be a person who observes it? How about a dog? Or a paramecium?

    I think I’m missing some important piece to this.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      It’s any interaction that counts. That could be with your eye, but it’s usually with any other particle that needs to know the position of another. That could be part of a measuring device, or anything else. If information is needed to “do physics” with it then the waveform collapses so the interaction can be performed.

      It has absolutely nothing to do with consciousness.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      312 days ago

      I might be talking out of my ass a bit, but if I remember it correctly the “observer” part was about it being impossible to measure velocity and observe a location of a thing (electron, photon etc. I think) at the same point in time. I don’t think it actually had an effect on the particle, i remember there were some bad experiments where the measurement influenced the the thing because the measurement itself like taking a photo or whatever they did was enough to disturb… stuff.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        812 days ago

        It’s because in order to measure it you need to see it. If you can see it then light is bouncing off it it and these particles are so small that the energy of a photon bouncing off of it will move it.