fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 个月前Zero to heromander.xyzimagemessage-square133fedilinkarrow-up1869arrow-down117
arrow-up1852arrow-down1imageZero to heromander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 个月前message-square133fedilink
minus-squaretate@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·10 个月前But there are an infinite number of things that you don’t have any of, so if you count them all together the number is actually not zero (because zero times infinity is undefined).
minus-square✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 个月前There’s a limit to the number of things unless you’re counting spatial positioning as a characteristic of things and there is not a limit to that.
minus-squaretate@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-210 个月前there’s no limit to the things you don’t have, because that includes all of the things that don’t exist.
minus-square✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 个月前Only if you’re able to define things that don’t exist by infinities.
But there are an infinite number of things that you don’t have any of, so if you count them all together the number is actually not zero (because zero times infinity is undefined).
There’s a limit to the number of things unless you’re counting spatial positioning as a characteristic of things and there is not a limit to that.
there’s no limit to the things you don’t have, because that includes all of the things that don’t exist.
Only if you’re able to define things that don’t exist by infinities.
I am.