In a Truth Social post, Trump attacked Biden − and Hamas − by accusing the president of “taking the side of these terrorists, just like he has sided with the Radical Mobs taking over our college campuses.”
This is what abstaining from voting will invite for protesters and Palestinians.
We tried to tell them.
Future tense. We should continue to try. I won’t judge someone who votes for Trump with conviction. The voter disenfranchisement manipulation on Lemmy is what needs to be challenged. It’s an unethical disengagement strategy, historically used by Republicans to disenfranchise Democratic voters.
I would legitimately be interested to hear what convictions a trump voter had that were real, actual, policy positions.
They’re just generic sales slogans and whatever gaffes he makes that the crowd applauds loudest for. Not actual considered positions.
That’s largely been my experience too, but I’m willing to hear out anything other than the “you can’t vote for that guy” line anymore. Trump’s base will vote him in if enough abstain. Inaction is action.
BuT bOtH SIdEs, cAnT YoU sEe I’m e n L I g H t E N e D?
deleted by creator
Good. that’s the message we need to go back and forth here to get uneducated voters away from voting trump because “Biden genocide”. Trump will be worse.
*Trump is worse for everyone that’s not a straight rich white Christian industrialist male with a subterranean bunker.
He’s legitimately good for those guys.
Edit: Whoosh.
Depends. How do you like your government officials? Competent? Or no?
Who do you believe to be more competent? The guy who rambles on until the media cuts him off and farts himself awake during trial daily, or the guy that’s four years older than him?
Is that a serious question?
The guy 4 years older than him.
10,000:1
You do you. Agree to disagree.Edit: I reversed what you said in my head. Yes, I would take Biden over Trump any day.
I’ll go with the guy that wasn’t explicitly referenced as the one “who rambles on until the media cuts him off and fart himself awake during trial daily.” Shit, the fact that people are considering someone who’s in trial daily is incredibly disappointing.
Agreed. My description wasn’t accidental.
deleted by creator
Recently, I was arguing with one, and they unironically suggested we’d be in a better position now if Trump had won in 2020.
Which is to say, I think you need to have one first in order to lose it.
Was it a body slam? Trump is quite fat.
Are we not pointing out “slammed” any more? I’m okay with that trend dying.
So that means it’s a good idea.
Sociopaths.
