• aisf*@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wholeheartedly agreed. The existence and ability to just easily off-shore everything and reduce costs, to a business; is like candy to a baby. You don’t blame the candy, or the baby, but you blame the circumstances that lead the candy to the baby. Keeping jobs at home is the only way towards the prosperity of the middle class. We unfortunately have policies that just favor the wealthy class over the middle class, and things like this happen.

    • crispyflagstones
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      In this case, the baby is part of a global group of babies (the baby-ouisie?) that persuaded many of the governments of the world to pass free-candy-for-babies laws so they could save money in their candy budgets and deliver higher return to their shareholders, so in this case, i’ll 100% blame the baby

      • aisf*@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Honestly also very true. Something reductionist (and wrong) about my statement - the baby doesn’t have autonomy. They just go after impulse. Corporations do have autonomy, and typically choose to go against the middle class.

        I did lol at the idea of a group of global babies trying to take over the world though 😂