President Volodymyr Zelensky believes that Ukraine’s partners “are afraid of Russia losing the war” and would like Kyiv “to win in such a way that Russia does not lose,” Zelensky said in a meeting with journalists attended by the Kyiv Independent.

Kyiv’s allies “fear” Russia’s loss in the war against Ukraine because it would involve “unpredictable geopolitics,” according to Zelensky. “I don’t think it works that way. For Ukraine to win, we need to be given everything with which one can win,” he said.

His statement came on May 16 amid Russia’s large-scale offensive in Kharkiv Oblast and ongoing heavy battles further east. In a week, Russian troops managed to advance as far as 10 kilometers in the northern part of Kharkiv Oblast, according to Zelensky.

MBFC
Archive

    • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t think it started as a proxy war. Russia just decided to be stupid, but at this point it may very well be a proxy war in fact.

      It’s to pretty much everyone’s benefit (except Ukraine’s) for this to drag out for a nice long time. The more manpower and material Russia and their allies burns up in this stupidity, the longer the rest of Europe can breath freely. It gives them time to rebuild the armies that they have allowed to atrophy. There’s probably more to it and it’s callus as fuck, but that’s the math I see.

      • leviathan3k
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        It is very much to Ukraine’s benefit to drag out this war if the alternative is Russian subjucation.

        If on the other hand the alternative you are seeking is flooding Ukraine with Western-provided weapons to the point that they annihilate the invaders and win quickly… yeah, that would be better for Ukraine than a drawn-out war.

    • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s a kind of mix of a proxy war. Russia is involved itself but Ukraine is used as a proxy by the west I guess?

    • Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      People forgot quickly how hesitant the European countries were, and still are, to send equipment to Ukraine. Germany didn’t send anything but helmets for a long while. They also cancelled North Stream, leading to increased inflation and lessened economic competitive viability. If anything, the proxy war is exhausting both Russian and European economies, with the US and China ready to scoop up the scraps in preparation for their intensifying trade war.

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Why would they? Much of Eastern Europe expects the US to step in for defense, and use that fact to justify lowering expenditure on their own military.

        Sweden has that shit figured out though

        Don’t fuck with the Swedish

        • Urist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 months ago

          The European countries bordering Russia, i.e. the Baltics, Nordics and Eastern Europe, contribute a far bigger percentage of their GDP to aid Ukraine than the others (if you ignore the new policies of Slovakia and Hungary). The US and UK gives/sells the most weapons, but Ukraine is pretty much bankrolled by the EU/EEA.

          The point is that the EU has sustained big economic losses from cutting ties with Russia, leading to movement of industry and production away from Europe and over to the other biggest economies.

          • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah, it’s a difficult situation. I haven’t looked at the recent numbers regarding European countries contributions and their own militarization, I’m sure they’ve drastically increased since the war started

            • Urist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Yes. Germany and many other European countries had little to none political support for investing in their militaries. Now they do, and it is going to be a problem later on. Capitalists want return on their investments, after all.

              The EU is very much on the top of the global neocolonial food chain, but they were mostly (looking at you France) not doing like super a lot (looking at you UK and US) of “interventions” to secure their interests all over the world.*

              * Most Western powers are part of NATO, which is its own can of worms. Still, Russia invading Ukraine has made support for NATO much more popular (see Sweden and Finland as case studies), and now the bloc is more consolidated than ever. The timing could not be worse with respect to the overtly fascist leaders gaining traction in the very same countries.

          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            great point re: contribute a far bigger percentage of their GDP to aid Ukraine than the others

            Slovakia and Hungary

            Will be fascinating to see what happens next with Slovakia. And Georgia’s protests don’t seem to be dimming either. Hungary… eh…

            • Urist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              Everyone in Europe knows really well that there is a reactionary wind blowing through the lands. Historically, this has been conducive to conflict and war. The conditions are different right now than then, but I fear not enough.

              I would love a different world order based on international cooperation in lieu of exploitation, but I do not see this as a probable outcome of tensions rising and reactionaries taking power.

              It is definitely worth keeping an eye on the protofascist and overtly fascist movements gaining traction, since they pretty much tell us exactly how they are going to fuck things up.

              • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                yep. The only hope I see for international cooperation is for tens of thousands to die from weather related catastrophes, and even then, it’s only a ‘maybe we can get our shit together…?’