• sorghum
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Because no one should have the rights to someone else’s labor. If it’s a completely voluntary system, that’s a different story

      • sorghum
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        6 months ago

        Democrat advocating for slave labor. Nothing new for the past 200 years.

          • Windex007@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            I don’t think libertarians really see wage slavery as the worst thing.

            I think the fundamental difference is that libertarians don’t care about outcomes. Or, at least they don’t think that they do as long as they have food in their stomach and a barrier against the cold.

            In their minds, it’s all about them not being compelled to partake in anything they don’t want to. If that means starving, fine (so they say, and I’m very suspicious of this claim), but at least there was no authority over them.

            Most sane people strike a balance between valuing good practical outcomes, and more abstract notions like liberty and justice.

            Full authoritarians say that only outcomes are important, that abstract notions like freedom are impediments to the greatest good, and you end up with things like the USSR.

            So you’re right that there wouldn’t be a minimum wage… But you’re wrong to appeal to the concept of wage slavery because it presupposes a libertarian values satisfactory outcomes. They don’t.

            Honestly there is no talking down a libertarian without first convincing them their lives are worth more than some definition of liberty.

          • ElcaineVolta@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            don’t even get them started on ‘age of consent’ laws, they always seem to bring those up too

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Roads? Slave labor. Taxes? Slave labor. Taxes that fund the police? Somehow not slave labor.

          Like you’re not wrong, democrats do advocate slave labor in the form of supporting the prison-industrial complex, but I know you’re not talking about that.

            • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              But you understand that cops, above all else, exist to protect the institution of property correct?

              • sorghum
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Do they really though with policies like qualified immunity and civil asset forfeiture?

                • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  They protect the institution of private property, not any individual’s personal property.

    • Captainvaqina
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Because no one should have the rights to someone else’s labor. <

      They should just lord over the true value whilst paying peanuts to the workers? Cause that’s where we’re at already.

      • sorghum
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        true value

        Glad you brought that up. The US Dollar hasn’t meant anything since coming off the gold standard, and we can’t control it’s value so long as the Federal Reserve controls interest rates, and the government has a monopoly over what currencies we can and can’t use. (No this isn’t advocation for company script, if you can’t spend it anywhere else it’s not currency)

        With actual competition between companies, the laborer could actually compete for the best jobs and get the best compensation for their labor.

        • Captainvaqina
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Capitalism will NEVER allow free competition, nor for the workers to be paid their true value.

          • sorghum
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            So long as government meddles in it, yes you are correct.

            • Captainvaqina
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              🙄 regulations are the only thing that slow the unfettered greed built into the system.

              Ya’ll have some weird and completely incorrect fantasies.

              • sorghum
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Regulations can also be lobbied by the businesses themselves, especially when they can afford to implement the changes required and their competition cannot. It’s what happened in the auto industry here in the US. Safety regulations that were naturally progressing were instead legislated and over the last century, we went from many manufacturers down to 3. The quality of product was vastly decreased and you hardly see anyone driving those shit buckets from the late 70s through the 80s when there was no competition.

                That’s not fantasy. It’s a fucking nightmare.