• thr0w4w4y2
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    yes that would be awesome, but the problem is that “make it publicly owned” means “buy out their shares” which is giving them a bailout, plus “service all the debt the company is in” which is another bailout, before you’ve even got started with fixing the horrible lack of investment over many years

    • ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Buying the shares is cheap if the company is worth nothing /goes bankrupt from fines for their environmental breaches

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      but the problem is that “make it publicly owned” means “buy out their shares” which is giving them a bailout

      The shares would be almost worthless.

      plus “service all the debt the company is in” which is another bailout

      Nope, the company would be wound up.