• PrincessLeiasCat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m sorry - this is just fucking stupid. Cars are becoming way too bogged down with shit like this that acts like a hovering parent who nags you constantly while having to know where you are all the time.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I want to crash my car into a brick wall every time it makes me click “okay” to the full screen warning that tells me it is my responsibility to keep my eyes on the road. Yeah, no shit, you fucking wanker.

      • FireTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        7 months ago

        The California Senate has passed SB 961, which would require “passive speed limiters” to be installed in all new cars manufactured or sold in the Golden State by 2032.

        They wouldn’t be liable for speeders anyways that’s criminal misuse by a third party. Just like how Craftsman isn’t to blame when someone gets hit with a wrench. And there are lawful purposes for vehicles that can travel more than the state’s speed limit, like racing on tracks or when rushing to a hospital in an emergency.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is such a stupid fucking timeline. No shit the manufacturers aren’t responsible for the driving behavior of the drivers. Ugh! Like, get a fucking clue.

  • entropicshart
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    If this passes in California, all their highways will just be a steady sound of vehicles horns.

    • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      the headline is very misleading. There is no beeping at other drivers, or honking of horns.

      Just a notification to you, the driver of your own car if your car a) knows the local speed and b) is exceeding it by a set amount.

      This notification can be disabled.

      like, if you’re in a 30 zone, and go 35, your satnav/gps will go “ding!” and a small light will go on the dash/lcd screen.

  • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    7 months ago

    We just got an electric car that does this and it’s annoying as fuck because it often messes up the speed limit and tells you that you are going too fast even though you are not.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      My thoughts exactly. There’s no way it’s going to be correct for every situation. It can’t take into account changing road conditions.

      • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s not even just the changing conditions. It just has wrong speed limit data in some areas and spmetimes it says there is work being done on the road where there isnt and similar

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    California freeways are 65mph. Unless there is traffic, most drivers tend to go around 80mph. They will be constant.

    In my opinion, this is trying to tackle the issue in a poor manner. People who are speeding already know that they are, so it’s not like a beep or visual warning is going to cause them to change their behavior. It’s trying to force a technical solution to a non-technical issue.

    I just can’t wait to see how quickly someone finds a way to bypass this nanny bullshit.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Unless there is traffic, most drivers tend to go around 80mph.

      And they aren’t constantly getting into accidents? Wild. Someone should tell the politicians that this might not be the source of the problem.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        And they aren’t constantly getting into accidents?

        Nope. The major freeways in California are giant 8 lane straight lines. You could drive 100 mph on them and be perfectly safe. You can see 5 miles ahead of you, and there are no curves or anything to fuck you up. The 65 mph speed limit is just there so that they can write speeding tickets whenever they want more money.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      What’s ridiculous is that the freeways can obviously handle and are safe at 80 mph, because millions of people drive 80 mph on them every day. So why not just raise the speed limit to 80 and actually enforce the limit on a regular basis? I’ll tell you why. It’s because they want to be able to go out and write tickets whenever they want more money in their budget, and they want to be able to pull people over on a whim. It’s hella nefarious.

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Information by itself, no.

        Having something constantly watch my behavior and nag me when I’m being “bad” is, yes.

        • kaffiene@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s not “watching your behaviour”. Nor is it “nagging”. It’s beeping when a speed is reached. Quit hyperventilating

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yeah absolutely fucking not. I control my car, not your fucking legislative whims!

    • glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      But you are (statistically, assuming you are living in the USA) really bad at it. Maybe you shouldn’t control your car.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Or maybe we need laws more like Germany because I’ll pass all those tests and be glad to see the failures taking public transport.

        • glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          You would pass all those tests, every idiot does. The harder task is to learn, that cars shouldn’t be driven by every idiot who passes those tests - even if you are allowed to do so.

  • xlash123
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    There’s a really good way to reduce speeding without dumb moves like this. Design the road for the speed you want. Most roads in the US are created first without speed limit concerns, only labeling them based on a weird metric of how fast cars drive through them. Then if they are going too fast, governments just put up more warning signs and call it a day.

    There are many techniques in the road design handbook that can be used to make drivers subconsciously slow down for their own perceived safety. And it works! So let’s do more of that and less of this “make car beep” nonsense.

    • BigDiction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Hollister, CA tried to implement one of those designs and it was comically horrible. Look it up. The stupidest fucking road I’ve ever seen. Made you drive like a drunk person on what otherwise is 25-35mph residential super straight road.

      • ThyTTY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        On the phones? Friend, we have huge-ass screens in cars now. With 7.1 sound system

        • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Good bless the Chinese engineers that created the head unit I got for my car off eBay! That thing is incredible

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      They’ll put it on the same fuse that powers your ignition or some shit, so you can’t pull it, just like they’ve done to the fuses responsible for them sending all their massively intrusive tracking information back to the company.

    • 0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Did op change the title? That’s pretty much what it says right now

        • 0ops@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’ve personally only heard “honking the horn” (like as in “honk if you’re horny”) here in the US. In fact personally when I read “beep” I think of sharp, bright, high-pitched, electronic sounds, like that are so common inside of modern cars, but sure I guess I can see where you got confused.

          By this same grace though, I wouldn’t call someone a misleading dick over onomatopoeia. If you tell me what word op should’ve used I’ll tell you why your choice is ambiguous too

          • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            “new bill requires vehicles to alert their drivers when…etc”

            notice the lack of type of notification? and specifying who is notifying whom? It isn’t difficult to not be a misleading dick.

          • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            next you’re going to tell me that people in the USA don’t have blinkers to indicate proposed turning direction.

            Heh. blinkers.

            It’s like going to the bathroom in a shopping centre. Like there’s actually a bathroom and not just a xitter or toilet.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    If they could automate vehicles this wouldn’t be an issue. The current tech isn’t there so what if we put them on tracks so they can’t crash? We could make them bigger so lots of people could go at the same time and fewer vehicles would be on the road. You wouldn’t even have to own it, they could have a regular schedule so you know where and when to ride in one!

    Nah, that will never work. Beeping at a driver occasionally though, that will fix things.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Many cars used to do this. There is a reason they don’t build this feature any longer.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Fuck this shit! Fuck it in its fucking face! God I hate modern bullshit! Yes, most people can barely drive the speed limit, but some of us don’t live with our heads perpetually up our own assholes, and there are legitimate reasons to exceed the speed limit. For one, if you try going the speed limit on the i5 in California, you’ll turn into a greasy smear on the inside of your car cabin, since everyone else is going 20 over.